Cheesex
10
Estimated Prizes
this month
£75
Estimated Prize money
this month
Cheesex's Tips History
20 June 2026
10:35 Canterbury Bulldogs v Manly Sea Eagles
Under 48.50
Total Points
50 WIN
@-109
Win
46
Under stands out as the strongest market because Canterbury generally succeed by slowing the pace and forcing opponents into controlled territorial battles rather than allowing expansive attacking football. Manly have scoring upside, but against disciplined defensive systems they often struggle to sustain attacking rhythm for long stretches. The tactical setup strongly points toward a lower-scoring contest overall.
08:30 Gold Coast Titans v Penrith Panthers
Penrith Panthers
To Win
50 WIN
@-476
Lose
-50
Penrith Panthers -13.50
Handicap (2-way)
50 WIN
@-113
Lose
-50
Penrith Panthers rate extremely strongly for the handicap market because few teams convert territorial dominance into scoreboard separation as consistently. Their disciplined style forces opponents into long defensive sequences, and Gold Coast have repeatedly shown vulnerability once fatigue begins to impact defensive spacing. Penrith possess all the indicators of a side capable of winning comfortably rather than narrowly.
Under 50.50
Total Points
50 WIN
@-109
Win
46
Under shapes as the strongest market because Canterbury typically succeed by slowing the pace, controlling territory, and forcing opponents into structured battles rather than open attacking football. Manly have scoring potential, but against disciplined defensive systems they often struggle to maintain a fluid attacking rhythm. The expected tactical approach from both sides strongly supports a lower-scoring contest.
08:05 Hurricanes v Chiefs
Hurricanes
To Win
50 WIN
@-232
Win
22
Hurricanes -5.50
Handicap
50 WIN
@-109
Win
46
Elite attacking quality and proven resilience in major New Zealand playoff rugby strongly support Hurricanes to cover regardless of the final outcome. Their speed in transition and ability to create scoring opportunities from turnover situations make them extremely difficult to separate from opponents over a full contest, even against one of the competition’s strongest sides. Expect a highly competitive battle throughout.
Over 60.50
Total Points
50 WIN
@-114
Win
44
Unlike Northern Hemisphere knockout rugby, New Zealand finals regularly maintain attacking intensity, which strongly supports Over. Both sides prefer expansive rugby. Both possess dangerous broken-field runners, and neither team typically abandons attacking ambition under pressure. Sustained momentum swings and quick scoring opportunities should create ideal conditions for a higher-scoring contest.
06:00 Wests Tigers v Dolphins
Over 52.50
Total Points
50 WIN
@-109
Win
46
Over stands out as the strongest play in this matchup because both teams possess enough attacking upside to create a fast-moving contest. Dolphins matches frequently open up once momentum shifts begin, while Wests Tigers have shown noticeable improvement with ball in hand. The overall game script suggests extended attacking periods and enough defensive vulnerability on both sides to support strong scoring output.
01:40 PIT Pirates @ COL Rockies
COL Rockies
Money Line
50 WIN
@+114
Win
57
The Colorado Rockies stand out as the more assertive and rhythm-driven side in this matchup, showing a stronger ability to generate consistent offensive pressure while maintaining enough stability to avoid prolonged scoring droughts. Their overall game-flow control gives them the advantage in a contest that often swings based on momentum rather than structure.
01:30 Brazil v Haiti
Brazil
50 WIN
@-909
Win
5
01:15 STL Cardinals @ KC Royals
KC Royals
Money Line
50 WIN
@+100
Win
50
The Kansas City Royals enter this matchup with a more balanced and steady profile, showing improved ability to manage game flow and capitalize when opportunities arise. Their recent stability and disciplined execution in close contests give them the advantage in what is likely to be a tightly fought matchup decided by late-game performance.
01:10 CLE Guardians @ HOU Astros
HOU Astros
Money Line
50 WIN
@-120
Win
41
The Houston Astros continue to project as one of the most reliable teams in this matchup range, bringing a disciplined and structured approach that performs well in high-pressure environments. Their consistency in executing key moments and limiting opponent scoring runs makes them the stronger side with the clearest path to controlling the game from start to finish.
01:05 SD Padres @ TEX Rangers
TEX Rangers
Money Line
50 WIN
@-153
Win
32
The Texas Rangers look like the more complete and stable side entering this matchup, with stronger overall consistency in handling pressure and maintaining control through shifting game momentum. Their ability to stay composed in tight situations and steadily generate opportunities gives them a clear edge in what should be a competitive but manageable contest.
01:00 Ernesto Mercado v Juan Carlos Burgos
Ernesto Mercado
Win Fight
50 WIN
@-2500
Win
2
00:30 BC Lions @ HAM Tiger Cats
BC Lions
Money Line
50 WIN
@-120
Lose
-50
00:15 MIL Brewers @ ATL Braves
ATL Braves
Money Line
50 WIN
@+139
Win
70
The Atlanta Braves continue to project as one of the more dependable teams in matchups like this, bringing a balanced game structure and superior control in pressure situations. Their ability to sustain offensive rhythm while limiting momentum swings gives them a major advantage, and they appear best equipped to dictate the pace from the opening stages through the closing innings.
00:10 SF Giants @ MIA Marlins
MIA Marlins
Money Line
50 WIN
@-117
Win
43
The Miami Marlins look well positioned in this matchup due to a stronger overall ability to manage tempo and remain disciplined when games become highly situational. Their recent profile suggests a team capable of staying composed through difficult stretches while taking advantage of mistakes at key moments. That steadiness gives them the edge and makes them the stronger selection for this contest.
00:10 WAS Nationals @ TB Rays
TB Rays
Money Line
50 WIN
@-120
Win
41
The Tampa Bay Rays remain the more complete and controlled team in this matchup, bringing a balanced approach that holds up well under pressure. Their ability to suppress opponent momentum while consistently creating scoring opportunities gives them a strong advantage, especially in games where late execution determines the outcome.
Subtotal441
19 June 2026
21:30 Krzysztof Ratajski vs Cristo Reyes
Krzysztof Ratajski
Win Match 2-way
50 WIN
@-124
Win
40
Krzysztof Ratajski has the stronger overall structure, combining steady scoring with excellent finishing discipline. Ratajski’s style is particularly effective against opponents who rely on momentum swings, as he rarely gives away cheap legs. Cristo Reyes can be dangerous in bursts, but sustaining pressure against a composed operator like Ratajski is a major challenge.
Krzysztof Ratajski -1.50
Handicap 2-way
50 WIN
@+129
Win
65
Ratajski’s efficiency on doubles and controlled scoring rhythm often results in gradual separation rather than tight finishes. Reyes may remain competitive early, but over time Ratajski’s consistency typically creates a clear gap on the scoreboard.
Under 9.50
Total Legs
50 WIN
@-120
Win
41
The matchup profile leans toward structured control from Ratajski rather than a back-and-forth contest. His ability to close legs cleanly reduces extended exchanges, while Reyes’ inconsistency in sustained scoring limits match length.
21:00 Daniel Mercado v Alejandro Medina de la Rosa
Daniel Mercado
Win Fight
50 WIN
@-3333
Win
1
20:05 Toulouse v Racing 92
Toulouse
To Win
50 WIN
@-400
Win
12
Elite attacking structure, superior squad depth, and consistently dominant performances in major domestic fixtures make Toulouse the clear outright selection here. Their ability to control matches through relentless phase pressure, sharp territorial management, and clinical finishing has separated them from nearly every opponent this season. Racing 92 possess dangerous attacking threats, but Toulouse currently look significantly stronger across the structural areas that usually decide high-pressure Top 14 contests.
Racing 92 9.50
Handicap
50 WIN
@-117
Lose
-50
Explosive counter-attacking ability and enough attacking creativity make Racing 92 able to cover the stronger handicap position even against one of Europe’s elite sides. Their willingness to attack space aggressively means they can generate scoreboard pressure quickly whenever momentum shifts. That attacking unpredictability often keeps margins compressed even when facing superior opposition controlling overall territory.
20:00 Niko Springer vs Tom Sykes
Niko Springer
Win Match 2-way
50 WIN
@-109
Lose
-50
Niko Springer brings a noticeably higher scoring ceiling and more explosive leg-winning potential than Tom Sykes. Springer’s ability to produce sustained 140+ pressure phases gives him a clear structural advantage, especially in shorter formats where early scoring dominance often decides matches. Sykes can stay competitive in isolated legs but matching that scoring intensity over the full match is unlikely.
Niko Springer -1.50
Handicap 2-way
50 WIN
@+150
Lose
-50
Springer’s aggressive scoring style tends to create separation quickly once he finds a rhythm. He regularly strings together heavy-scoring visits that force opponents into chasing positions, and Tom Sykes often struggles to respond consistently under that kind of pressure. That dynamic supports a comfortable winning margin for Springer.
Under 9.50
Total Legs
50 WIN
@-120
Win
41
The matchup points toward a controlled outcome driven by Springer’s scoring bursts. Once ahead, he typically closes out legs efficiently, limiting long exchanges. Sykes’ inconsistency on scoring visits reduces the likelihood of prolonged back-and-forth legs extending the match.
20:00 USA v Australia
USA
50 WIN
@-163
Win
31
19:45 St Patricks Athletic v Sligo Rovers
St Patricks Athletic
50 WIN
@-400
Win
12
19:30 Daryl Gurney vs Jim Long
Daryl Gurney -2.50
Handicap 2-way
50 WIN
@+100
Lose
-50
When Daryl Gurney finds rhythm, he is capable of building separation quickly through consecutive strong legs. Jim Long’s scoring inconsistency makes it difficult to recover once behind, which increases the likelihood of a clear-margin victory.
Under 9.50
Total Legs
50 WIN
@-149
Win
34
The expected match flow is controlled rather than chaotic. Gurney’s finishing efficiency should limit extended legs, while Long’s scoring inconsistency reduces the chance of sustained pressure across multiple consecutive legs.
19:30 Leinster v Bulls
Leinster
To Win
50 WIN
@-333
Win
15
Bulls 7.50
Handicap
50 WIN
@-120
Lose
-50
Physical forward pressure and strong defensive resilience make the Bulls cover the stronger handicap selection despite facing arguably the toughest assignment on the card. Their set-piece strength allows them to remain competitive for long stretches. Their tactical kicking structure gives them a path to accumulating enough scoreboard pressure to prevent the margin from stretching too far even if Leinster control possession.
19:20 TOR Blue Jays @ CHI Cubs
CHI Cubs
Money Line
50 WIN
@-117
Win
43
The Chicago Cubs look like the more balanced and dependable side entering this matchup, with stronger overall consistency in managing game flow and responding effectively when momentum begins to shift. Their ability to apply pressure over sustained stretches while avoiding costly mistakes gives them the clearer path toward controlling this contest and finishing stronger in the later innings.
18:30 Kim Huybrechts vs Keane Barry
Kim Huybrechts
Win Match 2-way
50 WIN
@-149
Win
34
Kim Huybrechts holds the edge through greater experience at higher-pressure events and a more established scoring rhythm in competitive formats. Keane Barry can produce strong scoring bursts, but Huybrechts typically maintains better structure across full matches and is more reliable in punishing missed doubles.
Kim Huybrechts -1.50
Handicap 2-way
50 WIN
@+110
Win
55
Kim Huybrechts is well positioned to create separation if he starts strongly, as his scoring peaks tend to come in sustained runs rather than isolated visits. Keane Barry’s volatility under sustained pressure often leads to gaps forming once he falls behind, supporting a clear-margin outcome for Huybrechts.
Under 9.50
Total Legs
50 WIN
@-120
Lose
-50
The combination of Huybrechts’ experience and ability to close legs efficiently suggests a controlled match. Keane Barry may take isolated legs through scoring spikes, but the overall pattern points toward fewer extended exchanges and a relatively contained total.
18:00 Dirk van Duijvenbode vs Madars Razma
Dirk van Duijvenbode
Win Match 2-way
50 WIN
@-188
Lose
-50
The explosive scoring capability of Dirk van Duijvenbode is the key difference here. When in rhythm, he produces some of the heaviest scoring bursts in the game, which can quickly overwhelm opponents. Razma is a solid competitor, but he generally lacks the same high-end scoring spikes needed to consistently keep pace.
Dirk van Duijvenbode -1.50
Handicap 2-way
50 WIN
@-120
Lose
-50
The favourite’s aggressive tempo and scoring intensity often lead to early separation in matches. Once van Duijvenbode finds his range, he tends to maintain pressure relentlessly, which creates strong conditions for a multi-leg winning margin.
Under 9.50
Total Legs
50 WIN
@-124
Lose
-50
The matchup profile suggests decisive phases rather than prolonged exchanges. The favourite’s ability to win legs quickly through heavy scoring reduces the likelihood of extended contests, especially if early breaks of throw occur.
15:00 Ryan Joyce vs Johan Engstrom
Ryan Joyce -2.50
Handicap 2-way
50 WIN
@-124
Win
40
Joyce’s style naturally creates separation once he gains control of a match. He rarely gives away cheap legs and typically punishes missed doubles immediately, which often leads to gradual but clear scoreboard gaps. That combination supports a comfortable-margin outcome rather than a tight finish.
Under 8.50
Total Legs
50 WIN
@+129
Lose
-50
This projects as a controlled, lower-variance match where one player steadily asserts authority. The favourite’s efficiency on doubles reduces extended exchanges, while the opponent’s scoring inconsistency limits sustained pressure across multiple legs.
14:30 William OConnor vs Jeffrey de Graaf
Jeffrey de Graaf
Win Match 2-way
50 WIN
@+100
Lose
-50
The stronger recent scoring trajectory and sharper overall consistency favor Jeffrey de Graaf in this matchup. The favorite has looked increasingly comfortable against stronger opposition and carries a more reliable scoring baseline entering this contest. The underdog remains experienced and capable, but recent performances suggest difficulty maintaining pace against players scoring consistently at this level.
Under 9.50
Total Legs
50 WIN
@-120
Win
41
The likely pattern involves the favorite gradually taking control through superior scoring consistency while limiting opportunities for momentum shifts. The underdog’s experience may help steal isolated legs, but sustaining enough pressure to force an extended match appears unlikely.
13:30 Kevin Doets vs Owen Bates
Kevin Doets -2.50
Handicap 2-way
50 WIN
@-109
Win
46
When this player gains early momentum, opponents often struggle to recover because repeated solid visits force rushed finishing attempts. That pattern strongly supports a comfortable winning margin rather than a narrowly contested battle.
Under 8.50
Total Legs
50 WIN
@+129
Lose
-50
This projects as a controlled match rather than an extended exchange. The favourite’s superior finishing reliability and steadier scoring production should prevent repeated momentum swings, while the underdog’s inconsistency reduces the probability of the contest reaching full distance.
13:00 Andrew Gilding vs Mervyn King
Under 9.50
Total Legs
50 WIN
@-124
Lose
-50
The likely match pattern involves efficient leg management from the favourite against an opponent who may struggle to maintain scoring pace. The veteran can occasionally extend matches through tactical play, but the stronger overall scoring profile suggests a relatively controlled contest without needing maximum distance.
12:30 Karel Sedlacek vs Tyler Thorpe
Karel Sedlacek -1.50
Handicap 2-way
50 WIN
@-124
Lose
-50
When facing less-established opposition, this player tends to gradually pull away by forcing pressure through repeated solid scoring rather than isolated explosive bursts. That pattern supports a convincing winning spread.
Under 9.50
Total Legs
50 WIN
@-136
Win
37
This matchup projects toward control from one side rather than an evenly contested encounter. The favourite’s ability to maintain steadier finishing efficiency should shorten the overall match, while the underdog’s tendency toward inconsistent scoring phases reduces the probability of a deep contest.
12:00 Justin Hood vs Benjamin Pratnemer
Justin Hood -2.50
Handicap 2-way
50 WIN
@+110
Lose
-50
Matches involving this player recently have shown an ability to generate early separation through heavier scoring visits. Once momentum shifts, the opponent often struggles to respond consistently. That pattern strongly supports a comfortable-margin scenario.
11:00 Newcastle Knights v St George/Illawarra Dragons
Newcastle Knights
To Win
50 WIN
@-357
Win
14
Under 48.50
Total Points
50 WIN
@-117
Win
43
Under stands out as the strongest angle because Newcastle generally win through disciplined defensive pressure rather than attacking shootouts. The Dragons have struggled creating sustained attacking rhythm against organised defensive teams, and this matchup strongly projects toward a slower, physical contest controlled through territory, repeat sets, and conservative game management rather than open-scoring football.
02:40 LA Angels @ Athletics
Athletics
Money Line
50 WIN
@-161
Win
31
The Athletics enter this matchup with a more controlled and steady overall profile, showing better consistency in managing momentum shifts and limiting extended defensive breakdowns. Their ability to stay organized through changing game states gives them a clearer path to maintaining control and finishing stronger when the contest tightens late.
00:40 STL Cardinals @ KC Royals
KC Royals
Money Line
50 WIN
@+100
Win
50
The Kansas City Royals present a more balanced and controlled profile in this matchup, with better recent signs of game stability and situational execution. Their ability to stay competitive across full-game stretches and capitalize when opportunities arise gives them the edge in what projects as a tightly contested battle.
00:05 CHI White Sox @ NY Yankees
NY Yankees
Money Line
50 WIN
@-153
Lose
-50
The New York Yankees stand out as the stronger and more stable side, with a clear edge in overall structure and execution during high-pressure stretches. Their ability to generate steady offensive output while minimizing costly mistakes makes them the most dependable option in a matchup where consistency is likely to decide the outcome.
Subtotal-74
Tips are normally be settled by 12pm the day after the event took place.
Tips history contains the last 35 days tips.
Please note that this information is for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon as an indicator of a tipsters real life performance. The OLBG Tipster Competition is a simulation game and some of the rules and prices used by the tipsters may not always be available in the real world which can lead to misleading informaiton.
