AsapNast
2
Estimated Prizes
this month
£10
Estimated Prize money
this month
AsapNast's Tips History
17 May 2026
15:00 Brentford v Crystal Palace
Brentford
50 WIN
@-136
Lose
-50
Brentford look slightly stronger at home, where their pressing and set-piece threat often make the difference. Crystal Palace can be compact and awkward, but they tend to struggle when forced to defend deep for long spells. Brentford’s attacking consistency and home edge justify the lean toward the home win.
15:00 Everton v Sunderland
Draw
50 WIN
@+275
Lose
-50
Everton are usually solid at home but lack consistent finishing to kill games off. Sunderland can stay organized and frustrate stronger sides, especially away. This looks like a tight, low-margin contest where neither team fully controls momentum. A draw fits the balance of defensive caution and limited attacking efficiency.
15:00 Leeds v Brighton
Draw
50 WIN
@+259
Lose
-50
Leeds United bring intensity and high energy at home, but that can leave gaps. Brighton & Hove Albion are tactically disciplined and comfortable controlling possession phases. Both sides have strengths that cancel each other out in different phases of play, making a draw a realistic outcome if neither capitalizes on transitions or set pieces.
15:00 Wolverhampton v Fulham
Wolverhampton
50 WIN
@+300
Lose
-50
Wolverhampton Wanderers at home are typically structured and hard to break down, especially in tighter fixtures. Fulham have attacking quality but can be inconsistent away from home against organised mid-table sides. If Wolves control defensive transitions and convert one key chance, they have a strong chance of taking all three points.
13:00 Marco Trungelliti vs Mariano Navone
Marco Trungelliti
Win Match
50 WIN
@+250
Lose
-50
Trungelliti has the experience and clay-court craft to trouble Navone despite being the underdog. If he controls rallies and forces errors, he can shift momentum. In a matchup that may be closer than the odds suggest, Trungelliti has realistic upset potential.
Marco Trungelliti to win 2 - 1
Set Betting
50 WIN
@+550
Lose
-50
This looks like a grinding clay-court battle where momentum can swing. Navone may take a set, but Trungelliti’s resilience and experience can help him edge a deciding set and complete a three-set upset.
Marco Trungelliti
1st Set Winner
50 WIN
@+179
Win
90
A strong start is key for underdogs, and Trungelliti has the ability to come out sharp. If Navone starts slowly or struggles with rhythm, Trungelliti can capitalize early and take the opening set.
13:00 Sara Bejlek vs Emma Navarro
Emma Navarro
Win Match
50 WIN
@+129
Win
65
Navarro is slightly undervalued here and has the all-around game to compete. If she mixes up play effectively and stays consistent from the baseline, she can disrupt Bejlek’s rhythm and push for an upset win.
Emma Navarro to win 2 - 1
Set Betting
50 WIN
@+425
Lose
-50
A tight three-set match is very possible given the balance between these players. Bejlek may have strong phases, but Navarro’s composure and adaptability could help her edge the decider.
Emma Navarro
1st Set Winner
50 WIN
@+120
Win
60
Navarro has the ability to start matches aggressively and take control early. If she imposes her game in the first few games, she can secure the opening set before the match settles into a longer battle.
13:00 Xinyu Wang vs Lois Boisson
Lois Boisson
Win Match
50 WIN
@+129
Win
65
Boisson is an underdog but can challenge if she stays consistent and absorbs Wang’s aggression. If she extends rallies and forces errors, she has a real chance to turn this into an upset.
Lois Boisson to win 2 - 1
Set Betting
50 WIN
@+400
Lose
-50
This matchup could go the distance, with Wang likely taking a set through power. However, Boisson’s ability to stay composed and grind points can help her edge the deciding set for a 2??"1 win.
Lois Boisson
1st Set Winner
50 WIN
@+110
Win
55
If Boisson starts confidently and keeps errors low, she can take advantage of any slow start from Wang. An early break could allow her to grab the first set before the match becomes more competitive.
12:30 Man Utd v Nottm Forest
Nottm Forest
50 WIN
@+425
Lose
-50
Forest come in as clear underdogs, but they have the tools to trouble United, especially on the counterattack. If they stay compact defensively and exploit spaces behind United’s back line, they can create real chances. With pressure often on United, Forest have a genuine opportunity to pull off an away upset.
Over 2.50
Total Goals
50 WIN
@-188
Win
26
Both teams have reasons to attack, which should open the game. United’s defensive inconsistencies, combined with Forest’s counter-attacking threat, could lead to goals at both ends. If an early goal comes, the match may stretch further, making over 2.5 goals a strong expectation.
Over 10.50
Total Corners
50 WIN
@-105
Win
47
United’s attacking style at home usually generates sustained pressure, while Forest can also create chances on the break. Crosses, blocked shots, and defensive clearances should accumulate corners. If the game stays open and competitive, reaching double-digit corners is very realistic.
Over 3.50
Total Cards
50 WIN
@+125
Lose
-50
This matchup has the ingredients for a physical and intense contest. Manchester United games often involve high pressure, and Forest will likely defend aggressively and commit tactical fouls. With both teams fighting for key points, expect plenty of challenges, making over 3.5 cards a strong pick.
Subtotal-92
15 May 2026
12:30 Geylang International v Balestier Khalsa FC
Under 2.50
Total Goals
50 WIN
@+240
Lose
-50
Even in leagues known for goals, certain matchups can become tighter than expected. If both teams stay compact defensively and avoid risky play, under 2.5 goals could land.
Draw & No (Result + BTTS)
Result and BTTS
50 WIN
@+2800
Lose
-50
This is a high-risk prediction, but if both teams struggle creatively and the match remains cautious throughout, a 0??"0 draw is still possible despite expectations of a more open game.
10:35 Adelaide United v Auckland FC
Under 2.50
Total Goals
50 WIN
@+120
Lose
-50
Both teams may approach this carefully, especially if avoiding mistakes becomes the priority early on. If the midfield battle slows the tempo and clear chances remain limited, under 2.5 goals looks realistic.
Draw & No (Result + BTTS)
Result and BTTS
50 WIN
@+1400
Lose
-50
A cautious tactical battle could emerge if neither side wants to expose defensive weaknesses. If finishing lacks sharpness, this matchup has the potential to end scoreless.
Subtotal-200
14 May 2026
23:00 Spain vs Israel
Tie
Money Line
50 WIN
@+1900
Lose
-50
Spain are overwhelming favorites, but international matches can sometimes become unexpectedly tense if the favorite lacks efficiency early. If Israel defend compactly and absorb pressure successfully, frustration could build for Spain, opening the possibility of a shock draw.
20:30 Real Madrid v Real Oviedo
Draw
50 WIN
@+600
Lose
-50
Madrid are favorites on paper, but rotation or a cautious approach could allow Oviedo to stay competitive. If Oviedo defend compactly and frustrate the home side, the match could remain tighter than expected and end level.
Under 2.50
Total Goals
50 WIN
@+189
Win
95
Madrid are clear favorites, but if Oviedo defend deep and stay compact, the game may not become high-scoring. Rotation or a slower tempo could also contribute to a lower-scoring match than expected.
Draw & No (Result + BTTS)
Result and BTTS
50 WIN
@+2000
Lose
-50
This is a bold long-shot prediction, but if Oviedo successfully frustrates Madrid and the favorite struggles for efficiency in attack, a goalless draw could develop surprisingly late in the game.
20:00 Bradford v Bolton
Bradford
50 WIN
@+160
Lose
-50
Bradford can use home support and momentum to challenge a stronger opponent. If they stay organized defensively and capitalize on transitions, they have a realistic chance to edge the game. Cup-style pressure and tight margins could work in Bradford’s favor for an upset victory.
Under 2.50
Total Goals
50 WIN
@-124
Win
40
These matches are often decided by small details, especially when both teams respect each other defensively. If chances are limited and neither side commits too aggressively, under 2.5 goals is a strong possibility.
19:30 Iga Swiatek vs Elina Svitolina
Iga Swiatek to win 2 - 1
Set Betting
50 WIN
@+332
Lose
-50
?wi?tek’s consistency and ability to raise her level in long matches make her the favorite to come through eventually. Svitolina has the defensive skills to make this competitive and likely steal a set, but ?wi?tek’s intensity and shot-making should help her edge a tough three-set battle.
Elina Svitolina
1st Set Winner
50 WIN
@+240
Win
120
Svitolina is capable of starting strongly with her disciplined baseline game and defensive consistency. If ?wi?tek begins slowly or struggles to find rhythm early, Svitolina can take advantage and grab the opening set before the match becomes more physical and tactical later on.
19:00 Al Ittifaq Dammam v Al Ittihad Jeddah
Under 2.50
Total Goals
50 WIN
@+170
Lose
-50
Despite the attacking talent involved, this matchup could become more tactical than expected. If Al Ittifaq defend compactly and avoid opening the game up, scoring opportunities may remain limited throughout.
Draw & No (Result + BTTS)
Result and BTTS
50 WIN
@+2000
Lose
-50
If both teams prioritize control and defensive discipline, this game could stay surprisingly tight. A lack of early goals may increase caution on both sides and lead to a 0??"0 finish.
19:00 Al Qadisiya Al Khubar v Al Hazm
Draw
50 WIN
@+700
Lose
-50
Al Qadisiya are heavy favorites on paper, but matches like this can become frustrating if the underdog stays disciplined defensively. Al Hazm are likely to sit deep and slow the tempo. If the favorite struggles to break them down early, the game could surprisingly finish level.
Under 2.50
Total Goals
50 WIN
@+245
Win
123
Al Qadisiya are favorites, but Al Hazm may approach this very cautiously and sit deep defensively. If the underdog focuses on limiting space and slowing the tempo, the match could stay tighter and lower-scoring than expected.
Draw & No (Result + BTTS)
Result and BTTS
50 WIN
@+2800
Lose
-50
A compact defensive setup from Al Hazm could frustrate the favorite for long stretches. If Al Qadisiya struggle to convert possession into clear chances, this has the potential to end in a surprising goalless draw.
19:00 Bosnia & Herzegovina vs Faroe Islands
Tie
Money Line
50 WIN
@+750
Lose
-50
Bosnia may have more quality on paper, but the Faroe Islands can make matches difficult with disciplined defending and physical play. If Bosnia struggle to create clear chances or waste opportunities, the underdog could frustrate them long enough to secure a valuable draw.
19:00 Girona v Real Sociedad
Under 2.50
Total Goals
50 WIN
@+120
Win
60
Both teams are tactically disciplined and defensively capable, which may lead to a more controlled match. If midfield battles dominate and neither side takes major risks, under 2.5 goals becomes a realistic outcome.
Draw & No (Result + BTTS)
Result and BTTS
50 WIN
@+1400
Lose
-50
This could develop into a cautious and balanced contest where both sides cancel each other out. Strong defensive organization and limited clear-cut chances may lead to a goalless result.
Subtotal-112
12 May 2026
17:00 Asteras Tripolis v Panserraikos
Draw
50 WIN
@+250
Lose
-50
Asteras may have more possession, but Panserraikos can remain organized and difficult to break down. If the underdog stays disciplined throughout, they have a good chance of earning a draw.
Draw & No (Result + BTTS)
Result and BTTS
50 WIN
@+700
Lose
-50
Asteras may control possession, but Panserraikos can stay compact and be difficult to break down. If the underdog successfully slows the pace and limits clear opportunities, a 0??"0 draw is possible.
17:00 Panetolikos v Larissa
Draw
50 WIN
@+215
Win
108
Neither side clearly stands above the other, and this could become a cautious tactical battle. If both teams prioritize avoiding mistakes over attacking aggressively, a draw looks like a realistic result.
Draw & No (Result + BTTS)
Result and BTTS
50 WIN
@+650
Lose
-50
Both teams could approach this game conservatively, especially if avoiding defeat becomes the priority. Tight defensive structures and limited attacking risk may lead to a low-event match ending in a goalless draw.
16:30 FC Zlin v FK Teplice
Draw
50 WIN
@+200
Lose
-50
The teams appear evenly balanced on paper, and neither side may want to take major risks. If the match stays compact and physical, a draw becomes a strong possibility.
Draw & No (Result + BTTS)
Result and BTTS
50 WIN
@+600
Lose
-50
Neither side consistently dominates offensively, which could produce a cautious, low-tempo match. If defensive organization remains strong throughout, a 0??"0 outcome becomes a very realistic possibility.
16:30 Mlada Boleslav v Dukla Praha
Draw
50 WIN
@+259
Lose
-50
This looks like a game where momentum could swing back and forth without a decisive breakthrough. Both teams have enough quality to compete evenly, making a draw a realistic outcome.
Draw & No (Result + BTTS)
Result and BTTS
50 WIN
@+1200
Lose
-50
This matchup has the profile of a balanced contest where both teams prioritize avoiding mistakes. If finishing quality is lacking and the midfield battle stays tight, a goalless draw could easily develop.
16:30 Slovacko v Banik Ostrava
Draw
50 WIN
@+250
Lose
-50
This matchup has all the signs of a tight contest between two evenly matched teams. If defensive discipline dominates and chances remain limited, the game could easily finish level.
Draw & No (Result + BTTS)
Result and BTTS
50 WIN
@+1200
Lose
-50
This looks like a close and potentially physical game where both teams may cancel each other out tactically. If chances are limited and neither side takes major risks, the match could finish without goals.
15:45 Cherno More Varna v Lokomotiv Plovdiv
Draw
50 WIN
@+225
Lose
-50
Both sides are competitive and closely matched, which could produce a tense and balanced encounter. If neither team gains control in midfield or converts chances efficiently, the points may ultimately be shared.
Draw & No (Result + BTTS)
Result and BTTS
50 WIN
@+600
Lose
-50
Both teams are capable defensively and may approach the match carefully. If neither side commits too many numbers forward early, this could turn into a tactical battle with limited clear chances, making a 0??"0 result realistic.
15:00 Mohun Bagan SG v Inter Kashi FC
Draw
50 WIN
@+700
Win
350
Mohun Bagan are overwhelming favorites, but Inter Kashi can approach this with a defensive mindset and frustrate them. If the favorite struggles to break through early, pressure may build and allow the underdog to grind out a valuable draw.
Draw & No (Result + BTTS)
Result and BTTS
50 WIN
@+1800
Win
900
Mohun Bagan are heavy favorites, but cup-style pressure and cautious play can sometimes slow games down unexpectedly. If Inter Kashi stay compact and disciplined defensively, they could frustrate the favorite for long periods and force a surprising goalless draw.
13:00 Anna Blinkova vs Leylah Fernandez
Anna Blinkova
Win Match
50 WIN
@+450
Win
225
Blinkova has enough power and experience to challenge Fernandez, especially if she serves well and controls the baseline exchanges. Fernandez is deservedly favored, but Blinkova’s aggressive game gives her genuine upset potential.
Anna Blinkova to win 2 - 1
Set Betting
50 WIN
@+900
Lose
-50
Fernandez is likely to have strong periods during the match, but Blinkova can stay close if she remains aggressive. A tight three-set battle suits the underdog angle, with Blinkova potentially edging the decider through attacking play.
13:00 Luciano Darderi vs Alexander Zverev
Luciano Darderi
Win Match
50 WIN
@+350
Win
175
Darderi is a big underdog, but he has the kind of fearless, attacking game that can trouble favorites if momentum shifts. If Zverev starts slowly or struggles under pressure, Darderi could take advantage and push for a surprise win.
Luciano Darderi to win 2 - 1
Set Betting
50 WIN
@+700
Win
350
This is a bold long-shot prediction, but Darderi’s path to an upset likely comes through a three-set battle. If he serves confidently and keeps pressure on Zverev during rallies, he can stay competitive and potentially steal the deciding set.
12:30 Clara Burel vs Tamara Korpatsch
Clara Burel
Win Match
50 WIN
@+250
Lose
-50
Burel has the aggressive baseline game to trouble Korpatsch if she dictates rallies early. While consistency can fluctuate, her shot-making ability gives her upset potential. If she keeps unforced errors under control, she can take advantage of the underdog role and pull off the win.
Clara Burel to win 2 - 1
Set Betting
50 WIN
@+575
Lose
-50
This matchup has the profile of a long three-set battle. Korpatsch’s defensive style can force extended rallies, but Burel’s attacking tennis may eventually break through. A 2??"1 underdog victory looks realistic if momentum swings throughout the match.
12:30 Shuai Zhang vs Himeno Sakatsume
Himeno Sakatsume
Win Match
50 WIN
@+175
Lose
-50
Sakatsume comes in as the underdog, but her movement and consistency can make this competitive. If Zhang struggles with rhythm or intensity, Sakatsume has the ability to extend rallies and capitalize on errors to produce an upset.
Himeno Sakatsume to win 2 - 1
Set Betting
50 WIN
@+500
Lose
-50
A three-set match feels very possible here, especially if Sakatsume absorbs pressure early. Zhang may take a set with experience and aggression, but Sakatsume’s resilience can help her edge a deciding set and complete the upset.
Subtotal1308
Tips are normally be settled by 12pm the day after the event took place.
Tips history contains the last 35 days tips.
Please note that this information is for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon as an indicator of a tipsters real life performance. The OLBG Tipster Competition is a simulation game and some of the rules and prices used by the tipsters may not always be available in the real world which can lead to misleading informaiton.
