AsapNast
I enjoy betting since 2011.
2
Estimated Prizes
this month
£10
Estimated Prize money
this month
AsapNast's Tips History
04 December 2025
14:00 Boca Juniors vs Tucuman de Gimnasia
Boca Juniors
Win Match
50 WIN
@2.25
Lose
-50
Tucumán de Gimnasia are dangerous outsiders capable of imposing a physical pace and unsettling Boca’s rhythm. Boca may assume control too early, opening gaps for counterplay. Tucumán operate freely as underdogs and could capitalize on pressure shifts, especially if Boca look labored, leading to a valuable away victory.
Boca Juniors to win 3-1
Set Score
50 WIN
@6.00
Lose
-50
A 3??"1 upset fits when Tucumán start fiercely, steal belief early, and force Boca to chase. Boca typically wobbles when trailing, inviting more mistakes. Tucumán can concede one set amid reaction but regain control through serving bursts and fast scoring runs, closing with authority for a stunning 3??"1 win.
10:00 IBK Altos W vs Daejeon JungKwanJang W
Daejeon JungKwanJang W
Win Match
50 WIN
@2.50
Lose
-50
Daejeon JungKwanJang W provide value, matching up stylistically against IBK Altos and punishing inconsistencies. IBK occasionally struggle with composure and can let opponents settle. If Daejeon maintain their defensive structure and swing confidently on transition points, they have enough to push IBK into discomfort and claim an underdog victory.
Daejeon JungKwanJang W to win 3-1
Set Score
50 WIN
@5.50
Lose
-50
Daejeon winning 3??"1 requires a fast start, and their compact defence allows it. IBK may nick a set amid rallies, but when pressed late they compress. Daejeon’s tempo shifts and blocking resilience pave a believable 3??"1 route, where they grab momentum early and close with conviction.
10:00 Woori Card Woori WON vs Korean Air Jumbos
Woori Card Woori WON
Win Match
50 WIN
@3.25
Lose
-50
Woori Card might be underrated, bringing aggressive tempo changes that disrupt Korean Air’s structure. Korean Air often starts slow, offering opportunities for a surprise foothold. If Woori Card maintain intensity and keep rallies messy, their emotional freedom gives them a credible route to stun the favourites and win outright.
Woori Card Woori WON to win 3-1
Set Score
50 WIN
@8.50
Lose
-50
A 3??"1 underdog storyline forms if Woori Card catch Korean Air flat, ride crowd energy, and exploit tactical gaps. Korean Air panic when forced from system, which Woori can apply with persistent serving pressure. One setback set is reasonable. The decisive pattern sees Woori closing out three frames to seal 3??"1.
00:30 Goias Volei vs Joinville Volei
Joinville Volei
Win Match
50 WIN
@3.00
Lose
-50
Joinville Volei are priced attractively and present a live danger for Goiás, especially if Goiás feel burdened by favourites’ pressure. Joinville usually play fearlessly and can convert long rallies into scoring streaks. If Goiás wobble late or overthink, Joinville can stay composed and complete a valuable underdog victory.
Joinville Volei to win 3-1
Set Score
50 WIN
@8.00
Lose
-50
Joinville winning 3??"1 works if they secure the important first set and create scoreboard tension for Goiás. When forced to chase, Goiás can tighten and drop rhythm. Joinville’s counter-punching style fits a match where they grab leads, concede one set, then finish strong across closing phases for 3??"1.
Subtotal-400
03 December 2025
22:00 JF Volei vs Minas
JF Volei
Win Match
50 WIN
@6.00
Lose
-50
JF Volei are huge outsiders, but that pressure-free setting can unlock risk-taking and momentum runs. Minas may rotate or mentally drop intensity knowing they’re favourites. If JF Volei serve bravely and defend scrappy rallies, they can feed a surprising surge that turns this into the shock underdog win of the round.
JF Volei to win 3-1
Set Score
50 WIN
@19.00
Lose
-50
A 3??"1 underdog result happens if JF Vôlei steals belief early and forces Minas into errors. Winning the opener could tilt the psychology quickly, and Minas occasionally loses patience when trials appear. JF Vôlei riding emotion, blocking diligently, and capitalizing on Minas' frustration fits a dramatic 3??"1 upset narrative.
20:15 Leeds v Chelsea
Leeds
50 WIN
@4.20
Win
160
Leeds appeal as a bold underdog pick against Chelsea, with Elland Road energy boosting their pressing style. Chelsea’s inconsistency away from home and vulnerability to transitions open the door for Leeds to punish mistakes. If Leeds control the middle and force turnovers, they can snatch a surprise victory with intensity and aggression.
Over 2.50
Total Goals
50 WIN
@1.80
Win
40
With pressing, counterattacks, and shaky defenses, this game leans toward goals. Leeds chase transitions aggressively, while Chelsea break lines when given space. Both sides concede chances easily, suggesting momentum swings and scoring bursts. Over 2.5 looks realistic, with tempo, mistakes, and individual brilliance combining for at least three goals in a lively match.
Leeds & Yes (Result + BTTS)
Result and BTTS
50 WIN
@6.50
Win
275
Both sides carry enough attacking quality to score. Leeds press high and Chelsea can punish defensive gaps. Leeds rarely keep clean sheets but create plenty going forward. An open contest suits BTTS. Expect goals at both ends, as neither defence inspires confidence. The game tempo will drive chaotic exchanges.
20:15 Liverpool v Sunderland
Sunderland
50 WIN
@8.50
Lose
-50
Sunderland become the ultimate long-shot underdog value call, relying on heart, home energy, and Liverpool possibly rotating or underperforming. Liverpool dominate on paper, but Sunderland thrive in underdog scripts. If they defend compactly and exploit set pieces or counterattacks, a stunning upset remains possible with grit, crowd pressure, and opportunistic finishing.
Over 2.50
Total Goals
50 WIN
@1.60
Lose
-50
Liverpool bring heavy firepower and shaky defensive spells, while Sunderland will need to chase goals to stay alive ??" perfect conditions for over 2.5. If Sunderland score early or Liverpool open up space, a high-tempo match unfolds. Expect attacking momentum, transitions, and mismatched lines producing three goals or more.
Sunderland & Yes (Result + BTTS)
Result and BTTS
50 WIN
@12.00
Lose
-50
Liverpool almost always score, but Sunderland’s best route to compete is to attack when chances arise, especially on counters and dead balls. Liverpool’s defensive lapses keep BTTS alive, and Sunderland can convert one or two big moments. Both teams finding the net fits an underdog narrative where Sunderland push harder than expected.
19:30 Arsenal v Brentford
Brentford
50 WIN
@10.00
Lose
-50
Brentford are very awkward away from home and love upsetting structured sides like Arsenal. Arsenal dominate territory but sometimes struggle to break compact, deep blocks. With Brentford efficient from set pieces, this could be closer than the odds suggest. However, Arsenal should scrape the win, eventually overwhelming resistance through possession pressure and technical superiority.
Over 2.50
Total Goals
50 WIN
@1.77
Lose
-50
Arsenal’s control should generate sustained attacking territory, but Brentford’s compact style often turns games chaotic once broken. They can score and will concede pressure. With late drama common in Arsenal matches, over 2.5 goals looks appealing. I expect either a dominant home showing or a more open endgame pushing totals higher.
Brentford & Yes (Result + BTTS)
Result and BTTS
50 WIN
@15.00
Lose
-50
Arsenal dominate the ball, but Brentford are deadly in transitions and from set pieces. They are always threatening even when out-possessed. Arsenal should score through sustained pressure, but Brentford consistently find ways to nick one. BTTS Yes fits, expecting frustration phases where Brentford counter-punch efficiently while Arsenal still generate their opener.
19:30 Brighton v Aston Villa
Draw
50 WIN
@3.60
Lose
-50
Brighton attack well, but Villa thrive in transitions, meaning both can hurt the other. With styles clashing, momentum could swing without dominance. Expect goalscoring chances, but neither side controlling long enough to convert the edge, leading to a competitive score draw as both settle for shared points.
Under 2.50
Total Goals
50 WIN
@2.05
Lose
-50
Both teams can attack, but tactical risk aversion may inflate here. Villa constrain games away from home, while Brighton struggle against deep setups. Expect phases of probing without breakthroughs, pointing toward a disciplined clash staying below 2.5 goals, as neither side fully opens defensively.
Draw & No (Result + BTTS)
Result and BTTS
50 WIN
@12.00
Lose
-50
Brighton’s possession versus Villa’s counter posture could produce cancellation rather than chaos. Brighton lack cold finishing recently, and Villa’s compact shape can suppress attacks. Expect spells of buildup without end product, creating a scenario where momentum stalls and a 0-0 remains very possible after a shared midfield stalemate.
19:30 Burnley v Crystal Palace
Burnley
50 WIN
@5.00
Lose
-50
Burnley appeal as a scrappy outsider capable of upsetting Palace, especially at home, where direct play and set pieces matter. Palace’s inconsistency and absences can expose them physically. If Burnley pressure midfield and commit numbers forward, a gritty one-goal win becomes realistic, fueled by effort and the home crowd boost.
Over 2.50
Total Goals
50 WIN
@2.20
Lose
-50
With disjointed defending and opportunistic attacking styles, this match suits over 2.5. Burnley press aggressively, Palace counter, and neither side controls space well. If one scores early, the game stretches, increasing scoring potential. Three or more goals feel within reach, with chaotic passages creating plentiful finishing opportunities.
Burnley & Yes (Result + BTTS)
Result and BTTS
50 WIN
@10.00
Lose
-50
Burnley concede plenty but score in waves, while Palace usually find attacking moments even when they lose. Defensive fragility on both sides keeps BTTS realistic, with tempo swings, mistakes, and pressure phases promising chances. Expect an open feel where both teams create enough to get on the scoreboard at least once.
19:30 Wolverhampton v Nottm Forest
Draw
50 WIN
@3.40
Lose
-50
Wolves’ creativity fluctuates, while Forest prefer counter opportunities. Both teams will find openings but lack the ruthless execution to seal them. With midfield imbalance and conservative approaches at key moments, this will likely drift into a tight draw where possession swings but clear superiority fails to develop for either side.
Under 2.50
Total Goals
50 WIN
@1.73
Win
37
Forest rarely participate in high-scoring affairs away from home, and Wolves lack sharp conversion. Expect physical midfield battles, turnovers, and broken play rather than open attacking. Under 2.5 reflects a realistic tactical grind with few decisive moments across the ninety minutes.
Draw & No (Result + BTTS)
Result and BTTS
50 WIN
@8.50
Lose
-50
Both carry inconsistency in final-third execution, relying on isolated bursts rather than fluid play. Expect Wolves circulating without incision and Forest countering sporadically. Defences could win the night, making a drab 0-0 plausible as both fail to translate buildup into finishing quality.
19:00 Veronika Podrez vs Antonia Ruzic
Veronika Podrez
Win Match
50 WIN
@3.25
Lose
-50
Podrez, as the outsider, can attack from the start, unsettling Ruzic with risk-taking and pace. Ruzic may enter cautiously, leaving openings for Podrez to dictate rallies. If she serves confidently and reds up early, taking the first set becomes a realistic underdog strike.
Veronika Podrez to win 2 - 1
Set Betting
50 WIN
@7.00
Lose
-50
A three-set win fits Podrez: snatch the first, lose rhythm briefly, then regroup in a decider. Her streaky style suits swings, and Ruzic could wobble under scoreboard pressure. If Podrez keeps belief and stays aggressive, a 2-1 underdog outcome offers genuine value.
Veronika Podrez
1st Set Winner
50 WIN
@2.88
Lose
-50
Podrez thrives when underestimated, and she can ride momentum if she stings early. Ruzic brings quality but also lapses, and Podrez’s fearless hitting can expose them. If she sustains depth and capitalises on break chances, the upset scenario becomes distinctly possible over a long contest.
18:30 Varvara Lepchenko vs Elvina Kalieva
Elvina Kalieva
Win Match
50 WIN
@2.04
Win
52
Kalieva’s energy and variation can unsettle Lepchenko if momentum tilts early. Lepchenko is experienced, but her level fluctuates, and Kalieva can punish patches of inconsistency. If Kalieva keeps rallies aggressive and dictates the pace, she has a believable pathway to a shock victory through pressure tennis.
Elvina Kalieva to win 2 - 1
Set Betting
50 WIN
@4.80
Lose
-50
A three-set script suits Kalieva’s underdog edge: winning early, absorbing a veteran response, then breaking back with fresh legs. Lepchenko may stabilize for a set, but Kalieva can surge again in the decider. Expect swings and tension, making a 2-1 upset the most compelling underdog narrative.
Elvina Kalieva
1st Set Winner
50 WIN
@2.00
Win
50
Kalieva fits the mold of an underdog who jumps fast, with youthful aggression unsettling Lepchenko. Lepchenko may start tight or slower, giving Kalieva a window to swing freely. Strong serving spells and early break chances make taking the first set at price a lively angle.
18:00 Athletic Bilbao v Real Madrid
Draw
50 WIN
@4.00
Lose
-50
Bilbao at home can be fierce and disruptive, forcing Madrid into uncomfortable moments. Madrid’s talent keeps them competitive, but the intensity may limit scoring flow. Athletic’s energy, plus Madrid’s rotation risks, can balance out, making a high-pressure stalemate appealing as both sides struggle to land the winning blow.
Under 2.50
Total Goals
50 WIN
@2.20
Lose
-50
Even with talent involved, this could stay tactical rather than explosive. Athletic’s pressing disrupts Madrid’s flow, and Madrid’s cautious approach away may reduce attacking volume. Expect cagey periods, few clear chances, and a controlled chess match under 2.5 goals rather than an open shootout.
Draw & No (Result + BTTS)
Result and BTTS
50 WIN
@13.00
Lose
-50
Bilbao can suffocate games at home, and Madrid occasionally struggle creatively in hostile atmospheres, especially if rotated. Expect intensity without precision, duels breaking rhythm, and little space in the box. A tense 0-0 emerges as a viable outcome if neither side generates the decisive quality needed to break through.
17:30 Amandine Monnot vs Zeynep Sonmez
Amandine Monnot
Win Match
50 WIN
@4.00
Lose
-50
As the outsider, Monnot can start sharper with free swings and no pressure, catching Sonmez off guard. Sonmez is expected to dominate, which may lead to a slow entry or rushed mistakes. If Monnot attacks early and serves fearlessly, stealing the opener is a credible underdog shot.
Amandine Monnot to win 2 - 1
Set Betting
50 WIN
@7.50
Lose
-50
Monnot’s ideal upset pathway lies in a gritty three-set battle: win the opener, weather a response, then outlast Sonmez mentally. Her underdog value grows in long exchanges, forcing Sonmez's frustration. If Monnot keeps errors down and drags the decider physically, a 2??"1 surprise becomes realistic.
Amandine Monnot
1st Set Winner
50 WIN
@3.25
Win
112
Monnot has enough disruptive tools and fighting spirit to flip expectations if she builds belief early. Sonmez’s heavy favorite tag creates psychological strain, and Monnot can exploit nerves with stubborn defense and opportunistic hitting. If rallies extend and Sonmez tightens, Monnot can grind her way to a shock win.
16:30 Sada Nahimana vs Leolia Jeanjean
Sada Nahimana
Win Match
50 WIN
@8.00
Lose
-50
Nahimana carries underdog volatility that can crack favourites, especially if Jeanjean shows nerves or inconsistency. She can pressure with fearless hitting, forcing longer games and momentum swings. If she snatches key points and frustrates Jeanjean mentally, an upset win becomes realistic, particularly if rallies get scrappy and Jeanjean’s level dips.
Sada Nahimana to win 2 - 1
Set Betting
50 WIN
@13.00
Lose
-50
A three-set grind suits Nahimana’s upset narrative ??" losing a set but pushing Jeanjean into discomfort and capitalizing late. Jeanjean may recover briefly, but Nahimana can surge again through aggression and belief. Expect a chaotic match where momentum flips, making a 2??"1 underdog scoreline a dangerous but attractive play.
Sada Nahimana
1st Set Winner
50 WIN
@5.00
Lose
-50
Nahimana offers appealing value to take the opening set by catching Jeanjean cold and swinging freely as the outsider. Jeanjean may start cautiously, while Nahimana can strike aggressively with nothing to lose. If she imposes depth early and disrupts rhythm, stealing the first set becomes highly plausible at big odds.
13:30 Beroe v Cherno More Varna
Draw
50 WIN
@3.50
Lose
-50
This fixture has the feel of a tight Balkan clash where neither side is willing to over-commit. Beroe can frustrate opponents at home, while Cherno More travel well enough to avoid defeat. With scrappy midfield battles expected and limited clear chances, a cagey stalemate looks like the most realistic outcome here.
Under 2.50
Total Goals
50 WIN
@1.67
Lose
-50
Neither club consistently generates high-quality final-third output, and both tactical approaches lean conservative. Expect compact defending, broken rhythm, and counter-heavy phases with minimal end product. A cagey, physical contest feels destined for limited scoring, strongly supporting an under 2.5 goals outcome as neither side commits numbers forward recklessly.
Draw & No (Result + BTTS)
Result and BTTS
50 WIN
@8.50
Lose
-50
This matchup screams stalemate, with both sides heavy on defensive structure but lacking a killer instinct. Beroe rarely dominate offensively, while Cherno More often prioritize containment. Expect long stretches of midfield congestion, cautious transitions, and few genuine chances, making a scoreless grind look highly realistic as both avoid risking defeat.
08:10 Sydney Thunder W vs Brisbane Heat W T20
G Voll
Man Of The Match
50 WIN
@9.00
Lose
-50
G. Voll is the most interesting underdog option for Player of the Match, with the all-round ability to influence both innings. Voll’s fielding impact, combined with match-changing batting spurts, gives him a wider path to a standout performance compared to the favourites. A strong Powerplay contribution could easily elevate him to MOTM.
08:00 India vs South Africa 2nd ODI
South Africa
Win Match
50 WIN
@3.40
Win
120
South Africa’s price makes them an appealing underdog, especially if their fast bowlers find early movement and disrupt India’s top order. India are favourites, but South Africa’s pace attack can completely alter momentum. A focused bowling performance, combined with steady middle-order batting, gives them a realistic path to surprising India.
04:40 Melbourne Stars W vs Sydney Sixers W T20
Melbourne Stars W
Win Match
50 WIN
@2.10
Lose
-50
The Stars come in as underdogs but have the kind of dynamic batting that can trouble the Sixers if early boundaries flow. Their spin options also match up well against Sydney’s top order. With a sharp start in the powerplay and disciplined death overs, the Stars can pull off a strong underdog win.
Subtotal-804
02 December 2025
20:15 Newcastle v Tottenham
Tottenham
50 WIN
@4.60
Lose
-50
Both teams attack fluidly, but Newcastle’s aggressive press at home tends to unsettle Spurs’ buildup. Tottenham can strike on transitions, yet recent defensive gaps suggest vulnerabilities. Given the home energy and scoring depth, I’ll lean Newcastle to win, grinding this one through intensity and crowd-driven momentum despite Spurs’ clear attacking firepower.
Over 2.50
Total Goals
50 WIN
@1.75
Win
38
This fixture screams chaos??"transition counters, overlapping full-backs, high pressing lines. Spurs’ style ensures chances, while Newcastle’s energetic approach amplifies disorder. With both teams capable of breakdowns as well as bursts of flair, over 2.5 goals aligns, anticipating momentum swings and set-piece threats pushing this past two goals.
Tottenham & Yes (Result + BTTS)
Result and BTTS
50 WIN
@7.50
Lose
-50
Both sides attack with pace and vertical intent, yet neither is defensively reliable at present. Newcastle’s intensity makes them scoreable but leaves gaps Spurs can exploit. Tottenham commit numbers forward too, increasing risk. BTTS Yes matches the dynamics, promising an exchange where both frontline units get decisive chances.
20:00 France W vs Poland W
Tie
Money Line
50 WIN
@22.00
Lose
-50
France dominate odds, but Poland’s counterpunching and goalkeeper form can create resistance. If France rotate or miss early chances, pressure tightens and Poland can linger long enough to hold parity. A tactically slow match could drift into a draw where neither side fully lands decisive superiority.
Poland (W) 9.50
Match Handicap
50 WIN
@1.85
Lose
-50
Poland with handicap is appealing ??" they defend compactly, force low-scoring patterns, and punish mistakes. France push the tempo but struggle at times versus stubborn blocks. With a goal advantage, Poland can stay inside the number and grind out a narrow-gap outcome.
19:30 Bournemouth v Everton
Bournemouth
50 WIN
@2.20
Lose
-50
This looks like a tight clash where Everton’s aggressive pressing could unsettle Bournemouth, but the Cherries’ home form keeps this balanced. Bournemouth’s ability to create chances wide gives them a slight edge, yet Everton’s counter threat keeps doubts alive. I’ll lean toward Bournemouth edging it, helped by crowd momentum and recent resilience.
Over 2.50
Total Goals
50 WIN
@1.91
Lose
-50
Given both sides’ tendency to give up space and push aggressively at home and away, open phases should emerge. Everton’s aerial threat and Bournemouth’s wing play imply multiple scoring routes. With momentum swings likely, over 2.5 goals is logical, with late pressure or mistakes expected to push this beyond two goals.
Bournemouth & Yes (Result + BTTS)
Result and BTTS
50 WIN
@4.50
Lose
-50
Both teams create plenty of chances, and neither has a convincing defensive record, especially when pressed. Bournemouth open games up at home, while Everton counter strongly, so both should find scoring opportunities. With attacking transitions on both sides, BTTS Yes feels justified. I expect a lively exchange rather than a cagey battle.
19:30 Fulham v Man City
Fulham
50 WIN
@5.20
Lose
-50
City arrive as favourites, but Fulham at home are gritty and structured, occasionally troubling bigger sides. Fulham’s compact defensive block might frustrate City long enough to create openings on counters. It’s risky, but the value lies with Fulham sneaking an upset, exploiting rotation fatigue and hoping City underperform in front of goal.
Over 2.50
Total Goals
50 WIN
@1.67
Win
34
City usually push tempo, forcing opponents to defend deep then break forward, stretching the game. Fulham are brave enough to contest mid-field rather than park the bus. There’s quality here to produce goals, especially late. Over 2.5 goals suits this, anticipating waves of pressure translating into multiple scoring moments.
Fulham & Yes (Result + BTTS)
Result and BTTS
50 WIN
@7.50
Lose
-50
Fulham tend to rise at home and often score even against elite opposition, punishing lapses on counters or set pieces. City’s attack almost guarantees they will find the net. With Fulham’s belief generating attacking spells, BTTS Yes fits, expecting City to concede one but still create enough to score themselves.
19:30 Germany W vs Faroe Islands W
Tie
Money Line
50 WIN
@18.00
Lose
-50
Germany are clear favourites but can drift into complacency. Faroe Islands work hard defensively and can clog attacks, forcing sporadic scoring. If Germany’s finishing isn’t sharp, a stalemate narrative exists where underdogs frustrate enough to force a draw possibility late.
Faroe Islands (W) 7.50
Match Handicap
50 WIN
@1.78
Lose
-50
Faroe Islands offer value on the handicap because of their deep block and determination. Germany may still win, but the Faroe Islands excel at limiting margin damage. With goal protection and disciplined defence, they can sit inside the handicap line and make this tougher than expected.
19:30 Netherlands W vs Austria W
Tie
Money Line
50 WIN
@25.00
Lose
-50
Netherlands tower as favorites, but Austria’s physical defence and deliberate pacing can stall scoring runs. If Netherlands rotate or lack urgency, Austria can steal moments, turning this into a nervy match where stalemate chances grow. Draw odds tempt in a clash where motivation level matters.
Austria (W) 10.50
Match Handicap
50 WIN
@1.80
Lose
-50
Austria with handicap holds value due to their capacity to compress scorelines through disciplined defending. Netherlands rarely chase blowouts, and Austria can drag the tempo down. With a multiple-goal cushion, Austria surviving waves and staying within the spread becomes a strong underdog play.
19:00 Barry Hawkins v David Lilley
David Lilley
Win Match
50 WIN
@6.50
Lose
-50
Lilley is massively undervalued but carries experience and composure that could trouble Hawkins if nerves creep in. Barry occasionally drifts mentally when heavily favoured, inviting counter-punching frames. Lilley’s break-building is capable, and if he gets ahead early or Hawkins misses key balls, a surprise Lilley win becomes far more realistic than odds suggest.
David Lilley to win 6-2
Frame Betting
50 WIN
@51.00
Lose
-50
Lilley enters as a huge outsider, yet Hawkins can be vulnerable early in events when rhythm deserts him. Lilley has shown patches of composed scoring under TV lights, and if he settles first, momentum could snowball. In a fast format, a confident Lilley run could see a dramatic 6??"2 underdog upset at great value.
19:00 Bolton v Bradford
Draw
50 WIN
@4.10
Lose
-50
Bolton are favourites, but Bradford hold enough counter potential to force balance. Neither side has a consistent attacking edge, so shared points remain appropriate. Expect conservative exchanges and a match lacking decisive quality, tilting toward a draw outcome.
Under 2.50
Total Goals
50 WIN
@2.35
Lose
-50
Bradford will compact spaces, Bolton rarely run up scores against solid blocks. Tight margins favour limited goals. Under 2.5 fits natural flow.
Draw & No (Result + BTTS)
Result and BTTS
50 WIN
@17.00
Lose
-50
Expect stalemate tendencies, with both struggling creatively under pressure. Longer defensive spells and congested midfield sequences can erode scoring probability, making 0-0 appealing as the final outcome.
19:00 Doncaster v Chesterfield
Draw
50 WIN
@4.20
Lose
-50
Doncaster are inconsistent at home and Chesterfield defend smartly, making the draw the solid pick. Expect a push-and-pull midfield battle without sustained momentum. Both lack the incisiveness to control the match across ninety minutes, so level terms fit their tactical tendencies.
Under 2.50
Total Goals
50 WIN
@2.38
Lose
-50
Doncaster don’t often generate multi-goal margins at home. Chesterfield prefer compactness. Expect tension instead of tempo, with limited chance volume, making under 2.5 goals highly reasonable.
Draw & No (Result + BTTS)
Result and BTTS
50 WIN
@17.00
Lose
-50
Both outfits suffer finishing issues and often settle into stalemates when game flow tightens. This should produce slow sequences without dangerous breakthrough moments. With defensive prioritization on both sides, 0-0 stands as a logical projection.
19:00 Kyren Wilson v Elliot Slessor
Elliot Slessor
Win Match
50 WIN
@3.30
Win
115
Slessor’s fearless style fits well against Wilson, who sometimes tightens under attacking pressure. Elliot has proven capable of beating elite names, so confidence won’t be lacking. If he lands early visits, keeps safety sharp, and forces Wilson off rhythm, Slessor has the tools and temperament to convert a big outsider victory.
Elliot Slessor to win 6-2
Frame Betting
50 WIN
@21.00
Lose
-50
Slessor has the aggressive style to trouble Wilson, who occasionally goes flat when under pressure. If Slessor brings heavy scoring and keeps his safety tidy, he could turn this into a surprise. Wilson is strong but not invincible ??" Slessor landing punches early could tilt control his way, opening the door to a 6??"2 upset.
19:00 Leyton Orient v Plymouth
Draw
50 WIN
@3.80
Lose
-50
A matchup in which Orient push but rarely dominate, while Plymouth counter stubbornly. Their tactical clash should neutralize strengths and leave the contest undecided. With equal spells expected, the draw is the fitting outcome.
Under 2.50
Total Goals
50 WIN
@2.38
Win
69
Tactical compression should mute scoring. Orient lack a cutting edge; Plymouth are disciplined and deep. Quiet finishing and few breakthroughs strongly suggest an under 2.5 sightline here.
Draw & No (Result + BTTS)
Result and BTTS
50 WIN
@17.00
Lose
-50
Neither side shows reliable conversion. Both often survive long dry spells when compressed. Expect scrappy midfield wrestling and a cautious late phase, making 0-0 a realistic conclusion.
19:00 Luton v Exeter
Draw
50 WIN
@4.00
Lose
-50
Luton’s price reflects favoritism, but Exeter can frustrate with a compact shape and counter moments. Neither side dominates enough to justify a decisive advantage. With long spells of midfield play expected and the away side countering risk-free, the draw carries strong value here in a tight structure.
Under 2.50
Total Goals
50 WIN
@2.10
Lose
-50
Expect controlled, cagey football. Exeter aim to restrict rather than exchange goals, and Luton will likely struggle to impose fluency. Limited creativity and high tactical caution point strongly to a low-scoring match, substantiating the under 2.5 angle.
Draw & No (Result + BTTS)
Result and BTTS
50 WIN
@13.00
Lose
-50
This match may see low-tempo buildup without penetration, which suits a goalless projection. Exeter will sit deep. Luton may struggle to break lines consistently. With both banks staying disciplined, 0??"0 feels realistic when neither frontline inspires high-chance creation.
18:30 Maccabi Haifa v Hapoel Tel Aviv
Draw
50 WIN
@3.50
Lose
-50
This matchup feels balanced by motivation and derby-like caution. Haifa may control tempo, but Tel Aviv have shown disciplined countering enough to pull games level. Both carry mismatched spells, suggesting neither will sustain momentum long, which fits a shared-points scenario rather than decisive separation.
Under 2.50
Total Goals
50 WIN
@2.25
Lose
-50
Despite talent, these clashes typically cage up. Tel Aviv's games are slow. Haifa struggle to accelerate against compact blocks. Limited space should restrict scoring, making under 2.5 highly viable, with both sides likely opting more for stability than freedom.
Draw & No (Result + BTTS)
Result and BTTS
50 WIN
@15.00
Lose
-50
Intensity may smother attacking rhythm here. Haifa sometimes freezes creatively in tighter games, while Tel Aviv absorb and disrupt, stretching sequences without end product. Expect midfield jams, hesitation in key areas, and chances fizzling out, leaving a goalless finish attractive given historical low-margin tendencies.
18:00 Hapoel Petach Tikva v Hapoel Beer Sheva
Draw
50 WIN
@4.20
Win
160
Even as big underdogs, Petach Tikva can scrap out stubborn defensive games, and Beer Sheva haven’t always capitalized on dominance. If the visitors lack urgency, this can drift toward shared points. Tactical caution from Tikva and a slower tempo from the favourites could blend into a draw scenario.
Under 2.50
Total Goals
50 WIN
@2.15
Win
57
A defensive tactical setup from the hosts, plus Beer Sheva’s occasional inefficiency, points sharply toward a quiet encounter. Attacking inspiration may be absent, with sterile dominance lacking penetration. A low-conversion game, where space stays limited, comfortably supports the under 2.5 narrative throughout.
Draw & No (Result + BTTS)
Result and BTTS
50 WIN
@13.00
Lose
-50
Petach Tikva often bunker deeply, which frustrates opposing attacks and limits scoring. Beer Sheva could see long phases of sterile control without penetration. With Tikva’s priority being damage limitation rather than initiative, a goalless battle isn’t far-fetched as the defensive block absorbs and the match stagnates.
17:45 Hapoel Jerusalem FC v Maccabi Bnei Raina
Draw
50 WIN
@3.25
Lose
-50
These sides match up evenly in ability and inconsistency, creating a draw profile. Jerusalem rarely push matches open, while Bnei Raina rely on reshape-and-wait tactics. Here, neither side is likely to establish dominance, resulting in a cagey contest where the safe conclusion is shared points rather than a breakthrough winner.
Under 2.50
Total Goals
50 WIN
@1.85
Lose
-50
Jerusalem prioritize shape, while Raina prefer stalling opponents rather than outscoring them. This should yield a low-event, controlled game without much risk. Long periods without sustained attacking pressure support under 2.5 goals, especially with finishing issues likely ensuring minimal breakthrough moments from either side.
Draw & No (Result + BTTS)
Result and BTTS
50 WIN
@10.00
Lose
-50
The attackers here often lack precision, and these meetings lean scrappy rather than fluent. Both defenses could maintain compactness, particularly mid-game once momentum slows. Expect few clear shooting opportunities, turning this into a game where sterile spells rule. A scoreless finish looks very realistic given their scoring records.
17:30 Bnei Sakhnin v Hapoel Ironi Kiryat Shmona
Draw
50 WIN
@3.15
Win
108
Bnei Sakhnin can be stubborn at home, while Kiryat Shmona rarely open up early, pointing toward a stalemate. Each side may cancel the other through cautious buildup. Neither carries enough momentum or offensive sharpness to justify heavy confidence, so splitting points fits the tactical flow both normally favor.
Under 2.50
Total Goals
50 WIN
@1.70
Win
35
With two pragmatic teams, expect a disciplined battle without attacking fluidity. They often rely on defensive stability rather than tempo, limiting the probability of multiple goals. Unless set pieces flip the balance, this projects a condensed game with limited breakthrough potential, suiting the under 2.5 bet confidently.
Draw & No (Result + BTTS)
Result and BTTS
50 WIN
@9.00
Lose
-50
Neither side possesses reliable forward lines, which leans toward a goalless pattern. This game may lock into midfield congestion early before settling into caution. Late urgency rarely arrives in these fixtures, reinforcing the likelihood of chances drying up and a 0??"0 result becoming the natural endpoint.
17:30 Tunisia W vs China W
Tie
Money Line
50 WIN
@14.00
Lose
-50
Tunisia favored, but China’s speed and unpredictability create matchup problems. Tunisia can be wasteful, which invites counters and keeps parity in play. A tense affair could see momentum shift repeatedly, opening the door for a surprise draw if China sustain intensity across both halves.
China (W) 6.50
Match Handicap
50 WIN
@1.78
Win
39
China getting handicap value makes sense ??" their athleticism and transitions can force tight margins. Tunisia rarely dominate fully, so China can hold close, converting breakouts into just enough scoring pressure. With a goals advantage, China covering the handicap looks appealing in a scrappy contest.
17:00 Argentina W vs Egypt W
Tie
Money Line
50 WIN
@15.00
Lose
-50
Argentina control the odds, but Egypt can scrap defensively and disrupt rhythm. If Argentina miss early chances or rotate heavily, Egypt’s direct counters can spark parity. A draw feels live in a low-chance, gritty match where neither side fully asserts dominance despite Argentina’s superiority.
Egypt (W) 6.50
Match Handicap
50 WIN
@1.85
Lose
-50
Egypt benefit from the handicap given their structured block and opportunistic scoring. Argentina may still edge phases, but Egypt grind margins tight with compact discipline. With added goal protection, Egypt can hang in and cover, especially if Argentina experiment or waste chances, making Egypt with handicap a live value angle.
17:00 Iceland W vs Montenegro W
Tie
Money Line
50 WIN
@11.00
Lose
-50
Montenegro are favourites, yet Iceland have shown they can disrupt higher-ranked teams defensively. This matchup lends itself to long possessions, stalled attacks, and swing sequences. A draw is realistic, with Iceland refusing to fold and Montenegro needing extra time to break through. Parity is possible over 60 minutes.
Iceland (W) 4.50
Match Handicap
50 WIN
@1.80
Lose
-50
Iceland’s grit makes their handicap appealing. Montenegro often win narrowly, and Iceland’s structured defence keeps matches tight. With a goal advantage, Iceland can grind every possession, pressure mistakes, and stay inside the number, offering good value against a favorite that rarely blows teams out.
16:30 Laura Samson vs Jazmin Ortenzi
Jazmin Ortenzi
Win Match
50 WIN
@3.50
Lose
-50
Ortenzi thrives in counterpunching moods, and Samson can tighten when forced wide. If Ortenzi drags points longer and steals initiative through consistency, irritation may creep into Samson’s game. In a drawn-out three-setter, that mentality swing gives Ortenzi the ceiling to land a 2??"1 surprise.
Jazmin Ortenzi to win 2 - 1
Set Betting
50 WIN
@7.50
Lose
-50
Ortenzi is dangerous when underestimated. Her ability to redirect pace and create awkward depth can frustrate Samson. If she hangs around long enough to force errors and extend rallies, the contest becomes a mental one. That’s where she can strike late, carving out a gritty 2??"1 underdog outcome.
16:00 Arda Kardzhali v Botev Plovdiv
Draw
50 WIN
@3.25
Win
112
This game shapes into a balanced contest, with Arda difficult to beat at home, but Botev capable of frustrating opponents. Their styles may neutralize one another, leading to territory exchanges without a cutting edge. The draw stands as the fair outcome, as neither seems superior enough to dominate for long stretches.
Under 2.50
Total Goals
50 WIN
@1.67
Win
34
Arda prioritizes control while Botev typically grinds matches down, which hints toward a cagey affair. Situational caution should keep this slow and structured rather than open and attacking. Expect stretched periods without high-quality chances, keeping scoring minimal and supporting an under 2.5 goals scenario comfortably in this matchup.
Draw & No (Result + BTTS)
Result and BTTS
50 WIN
@7.50
Win
325
Their chance-creation weaknesses make a stalemate plausible. Lengthy possession phases without incisive movement could lead to a deadlock, particularly if both sides lean defensive in second halves. With neither having dynamic finishing reliability, a goalless outcome fits well, reflecting two sides lacking the spark to separate themselves.
16:00 Lucia Bronzetti vs Chloe Paquet
Chloe Paquet
Win Match
50 WIN
@2.75
Win
88
Paquet’s power-first style threatens Bronzetti when she finds rhythm off the return. If she controls the first-strike tempo and leans into aggressive court positioning, she can break the match open. A scrappy middle set could then shift confidence her way, setting up a gritty 2??"1 underdog victory.
Chloe Paquet to win 2 - 1
Set Betting
50 WIN
@6.00
Win
250
Paquet’s best tennis often emerges in volatile battles, where her pacing can suffocate structured players. If she lands a high percentage of first serves and attacks early rallies, Bronzetti may wilt under repeated pressure. That tactical edge opens the door for a grinded, momentum-swinging 2??"1 upset payoff.
15:00 Camila Romero vs Anastasia Zolotareva
Camila Romero
Win Match
50 WIN
@7.50
Lose
-50
Romero brings a gritty, disruptive style that can drag Zolotareva into uncomfortable battles if timing clicks. If she absorbs pace early and returns relentlessly, pressure swings her direction. That path makes a drawn-out duel plausible, where belief grows and Romero edges a tight decider ??" a bold but valuable 2??"1 underdog pick.
Camila Romero
1st Set Winner
50 WIN
@5.00
Win
200
Romero is a sizeable underdog but has the tools to drag rallies and test Zolotareva’s mentality. If she starts well and keeps turnovers low, swings are realistic, especially in longer exchanges. A determined 2??"1 comeback captures her pathway ??" patience, belief, and pressure cracking the favorite in the decider.
15:00 Martina Colmegna vs Oleksandra Oliynykova
Martina Colmegna
Win Match
50 WIN
@8.50
Lose
-50
Colmegna is a long shot but possesses the kind of stubborn defensive patterns that can draw frustration from favorites. If she lands first serves and forces extended scrambles, cracks in Oliynykova’s focus may emerge. Once competitive, a tiebreak or swing set could tilt her way, supporting a dramatic 2??"1 shock scoreline.
Martina Colmegna to win 2 - 1
Set Betting
50 WIN
@17.00
Lose
-50
Huge odds but not impossible ??" if Colmegna serves smart and disrupts pace, Oliynykova can grow frustrated and inconsistent. A long-shot value play sees Colmegna hanging around, grabbing tie-break moments, and turning tension into a deciding-set steal. 2??"1 fits the shock narrative and maximal payout angle.
15:00 Nicole Fossa Huergo vs Maja Chwalinska
Nicole Fossa Huergo
Win Match
50 WIN
@16.00
Void
0
Huergo enters as a massive outsider, but her flat hitting and willingness to take risks can trouble a rhythm-based opponent like Chwalinska. If she redlines early, steals a momentum set, and forces pressure onto the favorite, a wild three-set swing toward a 2??"1 shock becomes a genuine long-shot opportunity worth backing.
Nicole Fossa Huergo
1st Set Winner
50 WIN
@10.00
Void
0
Huergo plays without expectation, which can free her game. If Chwalinska tightens under scoreboard pressure, Huergo can capitalize with fearless ball-striking. One big run in a tiebreak or decisive games is all it takes to tilt a tight match. That freedom makes a surprising 2??"1 upset very much alive statistically.
14:30 Spain W vs Serbia W
Tie
Money Line
50 WIN
@9.50
Lose
-50
Spain are favourites but Serbia’s defence and ability to slow the tempo can turn this into a tight tactical affair. Spain may dominate spells, but Serbia can frustrate long enough to stretch this to a cagey finish. A draw looks attractive, with both sides canceling strengths and neither breaking decisively late.
Serbia (W) 3.50
Match Handicap
50 WIN
@1.80
Win
40
Serbia getting the handicap is appealing because of their defensive resilience and physical edge. Spain can win periods, but Serbia absorb pressure well and stay in games. With a cushion on the line, Serbia can keep margins close, turn turnovers into counters, and push this tight, making the underdog handicap valuable.
13:30 Montana 1921 v Lokomotiv 1929 Sofia
Draw
50 WIN
@3.20
Lose
-50
This feels tight, with Montana competitive at home and Lokomotiv inconsistent away, making the draw the value play. Midfield congestion and risk-averse approaches could freeze rhythm, so neither side may find enough breakthrough quality. A shared point fits the matchup profile, with both preferring to avoid defeat rather than chase risk.
Under 2.50
Total Goals
50 WIN
@1.65
Lose
-50
With neither side known for sustained attacking momentum, this sets up strongly for fewer than three goals. Montana don’t usually overwhelm visitors, and Lokomotiv’s away scoring profile is modest. Expect limited big chances, long periods of containment, and a low-tempo game where discipline outvalues ambition, reinforcing the under 2.5 selection.
Draw & No (Result + BTTS)
Result and BTTS
50 WIN
@8.00
Lose
-50
Both teams lack reliable finishing and tend to prioritize defensive structure first, especially when stakes are high. The deeper the match progresses without breakthroughs, the more cautious the sides will become. This is a matchup where early midfield wrestling may drain the tempo, leaving neither team producing enough incision to break through, pointing to 0??"0.
13:30 Oceane Dodin vs Alice Rame
Alice Rame
Win Match
50 WIN
@2.20
Lose
-50
Rame has the steadier temperament when things get tight, and she can exploit Dodin’s impatience through measured counterpunching. If Dodin becomes erratic, Rame can string games together quickly. A grinding three-set swing, sealing momentum late, fits her profile well and rewards the generous odds behind a 2??"1 underdog victory.
Alice Rame to win 2 - 1
Set Betting
50 WIN
@5.25
Lose
-50
Rame’s counterpunching could exploit Dodin’s volatility, especially if errors creep in under pressure. With patience and discipline on return games, Rame can grind Dodin down, steal one close set, and edge the decider. A 2??"1 upset aligns with stylistic contrast and psychological swings Dodin often experiences.
13:00 Mark Selby v Peifan Lei
Peifan Lei
Win Match
50 WIN
@4.50
Lose
-50
Peifan Lei’s price carries huge upside because Selby can start tournaments slowly and sometimes loses focus when expected to cruise. Lei has shown flashes of scoring strength, and in a short-format match momentum can flip fast. If he settles early and Selby struggles, Lei’s aggressive potting gives this upset real potential.
Peifan Lei to win 6-2
Frame Betting
50 WIN
@34.00
Lose
-50
Peifan Lei could shock Selby if the favourite starts slowly and Lei capitalises on scoring visits. Selby sometimes struggles early in events, and Lei has nothing to lose, which frees him mentally. If he keeps long potting sharp and Selby’s safety is off, a bold 6??"2 underdog victory isn’t impossible at a big price.
13:00 Ronnie OSullivan v Zhou Yuelong
Ronnie OSullivan
Win Match
50 WIN
@1.36
Lose
-50
Ronnie enters confident, and although Zhou is dangerous, O'Sullivan's tactical IQ and ability to turn half-chances into frame-winning visits tilt the edge clearly his way. When Ronnie controls pace and punishes mistakes, he builds scoreboard pressure. Expect him to dictate rhythm and secure a solid win as the superior match player.
Ronnie O’Sullivan to win 6-2
Frame Betting
50 WIN
@5.25
Lose
-50
Despite Zhou’s talent, O’Sullivan’s ability to dominate frames in bursts gives him the edge. When he finds rhythm, he strings frames quickly and punishes errors ruthlessly. With strong scoring power, he can build an early cushion. Zhou may compete, but O’Sullivan’s class and tactical control point to a professional 6??"2 win for the Rocket.
12:00 Tina Smith vs Fiona Ferro
Fiona Ferro
Win Match
50 WIN
@2.30
Win
65
Ferro’s baseline weight and superior physicality give her a chance to outlast Smith as sets progress. If she neutralizes the opening surge and forces extended points, Smith may fade in the deciding set. Ferro’s ability to strike in patches makes a 2??"1 comeback upset genuinely believable at this price.
Fiona Ferro to win 2 - 1
Set Betting
50 WIN
@5.25
Win
212
Ferro has a higher ceiling when locked in, and if she steadies her depth, she can drag Smith into uncomfortable patterns. Expect trading momentum, with Ferro breaking late. A gritty comeback 2??"1 fits her game profile??"unpredictable but dangerous when timing arrives, especially against modest favorites.
10:30 Jessika Ponchet vs Mona Barthel
Jessika Ponchet
Win Match
50 WIN
@2.00
Lose
-50
Ponchet thrives in scrappy exchanges, and Barthel’s inconsistency invites danger if she slips mentally. Ponchet’s variety and court coverage can drag the match deeper, creating pressure Barthel doesn’t always handle well. With tactical discipline and a few timely breaks, the underdog 2??"1 scenario becomes very appealing given the matchup volatility.
Jessika Ponchet to win 2 - 1
Set Betting
50 WIN
@4.75
Lose
-50
Ponchet has enough consistency and defensive resilience to frustrate Barthel’s streaky hitting. In a tight matchup, the underdog’s determination could prevail over three sets. Ponchet grinding through longer exchanges and capitalizing on Barthel’s dips makes 2??"1 a lively angle, turning value into a tactical upset.
09:10 Perth Scorchers W vs Melbourne Renegades W T20
Melbourne Renegades W
Win Match
50 WIN
@2.20
Lose
-50
The Renegades provide the more attractive underdog angle here, especially with their middle-order hitters capable of flipping momentum quickly. Perth are strong but not invincible, especially if pressured early. If the Renegades pick up wickets in the powerplay and maintain tight lines late, the upset path becomes very realistic.
08:00 Bangladesh vs Ireland 3rd T20 Match
Ireland
Win Match
50 WIN
@3.25
Lose
-50
Ireland offer a dangerous underdog threat because of their fearless batting approach and capacity to pressure Bangladesh through aggressive stroke-making. Bangladesh are favourites at home, yet Ireland frequently raise their level in shorter formats. If their seamers control the powerplay and boundaries come steadily, Ireland can absolutely push for a surprising win.
Subtotal-969
Tips are normally be settled by 12pm the day after the event took place.
Tips history contains the last 35 days tips.
Please note that this information is for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon as an indicator of a tipsters real life performance. The OLBG Tipster Competition is a simulation game and some of the rules and prices used by the tipsters may not always be available in the real world which can lead to misleading informaiton.
