ju29ro

7

Estimated Prizes
this month

£35

Estimated Prize money
this month

31 January 2026
04:55 Northern Districts vs Canterbury T20

Canterbury

Win Match

50 WIN

@-109

Lose

-50

Canterbury enter with a more balanced attack and a proven ability to control the final five overs, an area where Northern Districts have struggled. Their seamers have been more consistent at the death, and the batting unit has shown greater stability under pressure. In a format decided by small margins, Canterbury’s stronger structure and late-innings execution give them the edge.
02:00 Bryan Flores v Starling Castillo

Draw

Win Fight

50 WIN

@+1400

Lose

-50

A draw becomes plausible when both fighters show near-identical competitive profiles. Flores enters at 27-1-1 and Castillo at 20-1-1, with both men sharing the same weight class, similar age (29 vs. 30), and identical listed height of 5'8". This statistical symmetry, combined with both fighters’ recent form patterns ??" Flores with multiple wins and Castillo with mixed but competitive results ??" supports a scenario where neither man decisively separates himself over ten rounds, resulting in a draw.

Draw or Technical Draw

Outcome 5-Way

50 WIN

@+1400

Lose

-50

Flores is described as a solid, durable professional whose only loss came via a split decision, indicating he is difficult to beat clearly. Castillo, meanwhile, carries comparable power (13 KOs vs. Flores’ 16) and has shown resilience across his recent bouts. Their shared super-lightweight frame and similar physical tools reduce the likelihood of a stylistic mismatch. With both fighters historically competitive in close fights and the matchup framed as a balanced contest, a tactical, back-and-forth bout with no decisive momentum swing could realistically end in a draw on the judges’ scorecards.
01:10 Wellington W vs Auckland W T20

Auckland W

Win Match

50 WIN

@+110

Lose

-50

Auckland’s top-order has been striking with far better intent recently, and their powerplay scoring gives them a strong platform in short formats. Wellington rely heavily on two key bowlers, and Auckland’s deeper batting lineup is well-suited to exploiting any loose overs. If Auckland maintain discipline in the middle overs, their superior boundary rate should carry them to a narrow but deserved win.
30 January 2026
22:45 Stephen Bunting vs Jeffrey de Graaf

Jeffrey de Graaf

Win Match 2-way

50 WIN

@+225

Lose

-50

De Graaf’s recent scoring consistency and improved checkout rate give him a realistic chance to beat Bunting. If he maintains steady mid-range scoring and limits Bunting’s momentum bursts, he can control enough legs to secure the overall win.

Jeffrey de Graaf 1.50

Handicap 2-way

50 WIN

@+110

Lose

-50

De Graaf’s steady scoring and reliable doubles make winning multiple sets highly plausible. Bunting’s volatility creates openings even when he scores heavily. As long as De Graaf avoids long checkout droughts, taking two or more sets aligns with his current performance level.

Jeffrey de Graaf to win 3-1

Leg Betting

50 WIN

@+850

Lose

-50

A 3-1 result fits a match where De Graaf starts strongly, takes early control, and maintains stable finishing. Bunting likely steals one set through a scoring surge, but his inconsistency across longer matches makes sustaining pressure difficult, allowing De Graaf to close out three sets.
00:40 Paisas vs Astros de Jalisco

Paisas

Money Line

50 WIN

@+550

Lose

-50

Paisas have shown stronger late-game resilience and a more balanced scoring distribution compared to Astros de Jalisco. If they control the tempo and limit turnovers, their perimeter shooting and transition efficiency give them a real path to victory. Astros rely heavily on momentum runs, but Paisas have the defensive structure to slow those down. In a controlled, disciplined matchup, Paisas winning outright is a credible and data-supported scenario.

Paisas 11.50

Pointspread

50 WIN

@-120

Lose

-50

Even if Paisas do not win, they match up well enough to stay within an 11-point margin. Their defensive rotations are solid, and they rarely allow extended scoring droughts, which keeps games close. Astros de Jalisco can be explosive, but they also struggle with consistency across quarters. Paisas’ ability to generate steady offense through ball movement and mid-range creation makes a tight game the most likely outcome, supporting the +11.5 handicap.
29 January 2026
22:30 Gian van Veen vs Ryan Joyce

Under 3.50

Total Sets

50 WIN

@+170

Lose

-50

Van Veen has been one of the fastest-rising players, with strong scoring phases and a fearless stage presence. Joyce is steady but lacks the explosive scoring needed to keep up if Van Veen finds his rhythm. Over a best-of-five format, Van Veen is well positioned to win by margin, with 3-0 the most likely outcome.
22:00 Michael van Gerwen vs Damon Heta

Under 3.50

Total Sets

50 WIN

@+200

Lose

-50

Heta is a solid opponent, but van Gerwen’s peak level is significantly higher, and his stage intensity usually rises in major events. MvG’s scoring surges often break opponents early, and Heta tends to fade when forced into long, high-pressure legs. A 3-0 win for van Gerwen fits the matchup and supports this tip.
21:45 Gerwyn Price vs James Hurrell

Gerwyn Price -1.50

Handicap 2-way

50 WIN

@-149

Win

34

Price should control this match from the start thanks to his superior scoring pace and heavy finishing. Hurrell can compete in short bursts but lacks the sustained pressure needed to trouble Price over multiple sets. A 3-0 or 3-1 win is the most realistic projection, making the -1.50 handicap strongly justified.
20:45 Nathan Aspinall vs Shane McGuirk

Nathan Aspinall -1.50

Handicap 2-way

50 WIN

@-133

Win

38

Aspinall brings far more experience, heavier scoring, and better finishing under pressure. McGuirk can produce isolated good legs but lacks the sustained quality needed to push Aspinall deep in a best-of-five format. A 3-0 or 3-1 win for Aspinall is the most likely scenario, making the -1.50 handicap well supported.
20:15 James Wade vs Madars Razma

Madars Razma 1.50

Handicap 2-way

50 WIN

@-120

Win

41

Razma is inconsistent, but his ceiling is high enough to keep this match competitive. Wade rarely dominates early rounds and often allows opponents to take at least one set due to his slower tempo and lower-scoring bursts. Even if Wade wins, a 3-2 outcome is very realistic, which makes Razma +1.50 a strong value position.
19:45 Gary Anderson vs Niels Zonneveld

Gary Anderson -1.50

Handicap 2-way

50 WIN

@-120

Lose

-50

Anderson is playing at a far higher level than Zonneveld in both scoring power and stage consistency. His recent averages have been strong enough to create early separation, and Zonneveld often struggles to maintain pressure across multiple sets. A 3-0 or 3-1 win for Anderson fits his current form, making the -1.50 handicap fully justified.
19:15 Chris Dobey vs Jermaine Wattimena

Jermaine Wattimena

Win Match 2-way

50 WIN

@+110

Lose

-50

Dobey has shown stronger consistency in recent stage events and usually handles pressure moments better. Wattimena can produce bursts of high scoring, yet his match control often fluctuates. Because of this, backing him to win the match straight is a risky angle that relies on Dobey underperforming rather than Wattimena dominating.

Jermaine Wattimena 1.50

Handicap 2-way

50 WIN

@-188

Lose

-50

This line is strongly supported by their typical match patterns. Both players tend to trade momentum, and Wattimena rarely collapses completely in short-format matches. His scoring power is high enough to secure at least two sets, and his tempo often disrupts opponents. This market benefits from competitiveness rather than requiring an upset.

Over 4.50

Total Sets

50 WIN

@+175

Lose

-50

The over is one of the most logical projections for this matchup. Dobey is the stronger player overall, but Wattimena consistently produces at least one strong set in early rounds. Their contrasting rhythms create swings that naturally extend matches. In a best-of-five structure, any balanced contest tends to reach a deciding set, and both players have shown enough inconsistency to trade sets rather than dominate. Over 4.5 sets fits the statistical profile of their styles.

Jermaine Wattimena to win 3-2

Leg Betting

50 WIN

@+400

Lose

-50

A 3-2 win for Wattimena is a realistic upset scenario because his scoring bursts often allow him to take isolated sets even against stronger opponents. Dobey is the favorite, but he can be slow to settle, and Wattimena’s aggressive pace can force a deciding set. If Wattimena maintains pressure on the outer ring and avoids long scoring droughts, a 3-2 victory becomes a credible outcome, especially in a volatile best-of-five format.
27 January 2026
20:00 Doncaster v Leyton Orient

Leyton Orient

50 WIN

@+250

Lose

-50

Leyton Orient bring more stability and attacking cohesion into this fixture. Doncaster often struggle to maintain defensive shape under pressure, something Orient can exploit with quick passing and movement. If Orient impose their rhythm early, an away victory becomes the most probable scenario.
20:00 Reading v Exeter

Exeter

50 WIN

@+245

Lose

-50

Exeter have shown strong tactical discipline and a clear identity, which could trouble a Reading side that sometimes lacks consistency. If Exeter control midfield transitions and stay compact defensively, they can create decisive chances. An away win feels like the more reliable prediction here.
19:45 Barnet v Tranmere

Tranmere

50 WIN

@+440

Lose

-50

Tranmere possess enough structure and experience to challenge Barnet, especially in tight matches where discipline matters. Barnet can be lively going forward, but they sometimes leave gaps that well-organized teams exploit. If Tranmere stay patient and take their key chances, an away win is a strong possibility.
19:45 Barrow v Oldham

Barrow

50 WIN

@+220

Void

0

Barrow usually perform with confidence at home, using their compact shape and steady build-up to control matches. Oldham can be competitive, yet they struggle to maintain intensity for long stretches. If Barrow impose their rhythm early, a home win becomes the most convincing outcome.
19:45 Blackpool v Stockport

Blackpool

50 WIN

@+229

Lose

-50

Blackpool appear well positioned to control this match with their superior structure and home advantage. Stockport can be dangerous, but Blackpool tend to dominate possession and create more consistent chances at Bloomfield Road. If they maintain focus, a home win is the most convincing outcome.
19:45 Bolton v Burton Albion

Burton Albion

50 WIN

@+600

Lose

-50

Burton Albion look capable of surprising Bolton despite the hosts usually being strong at home. Burton tend to thrive in tight, physical matches and could exploit defensive gaps if Bolton start slowly. An away win seems realistic given Burton's recent discipline and ability to counter with purpose.
19:45 Bromley v Crewe

Crewe

50 WIN

@+400

Lose

-50

Crewe have shown better consistency in controlling midfield phases and creating clear scoring opportunities. Bromley can be stubborn, yet they often struggle against teams with sharper movement. If Crewe dictate the rhythm and avoid defensive errors, an away victory appears the most credible outcome.
19:45 Cambridge Utd v Shrewsbury

Shrewsbury

50 WIN

@+550

Lose

-50

Shrewsbury have the tactical discipline and physical edge to unsettle Cambridge over the full ninety minutes. Cambridge sometimes struggle when forced into quick transitions, an area where Shrewsbury excel. If the visitors stay compact and take advantage of counterattacking moments, an away victory becomes a convincing prediction.
19:45 Cardiff v Barnsley

Barnsley

50 WIN

@+400

Lose

-50

Barnsley enter this match with enough intensity and structure to trouble Cardiff throughout the ninety minutes. Cardiff can be inconsistent when pressed aggressively, and Barnsley often excel in exactly that scenario. If Barnsley maintain their tempo and convert early chances, an away victory becomes the most convincing outcome.
19:45 Cheltenham v Gillingham

Cheltenham

50 WIN

@+225

Void

0

Cheltenham have shown improved structure and resilience, especially in home fixtures. Gillingham can be unpredictable and often struggle to break down disciplined defenses. If Cheltenham maintain focus and convert their best chances, a home victory stands out as the most logical prediction.
19:45 Colchester v Grimsby

Grimsby

50 WIN

@+229

Win

115

Grimsby appear capable of taking advantage of Colchester's defensive instability. Colchester can create chances but often fail to manage key moments. If Grimsby stay organized and strike during transitions, they have a strong chance of securing all three points away from home.
19:45 Harrogate Town v Fleetwood Town

Harrogate Town

50 WIN

@+279

Lose

-50

Harrogate Town bring strong work rate and tactical organization into this match, which could unsettle Fleetwood. The visitors sometimes lack consistency in midfield battles, giving Harrogate opportunities to dictate play. If the hosts maintain pressure and stay clinical, a home win looks entirely achievable.
19:45 Huddersfield v Luton

Luton

50 WIN

@+279

Lose

-50

Luton possess the physical edge and tactical sharpness needed to unsettle Huddersfield. The hosts can be vulnerable when forced into quick defensive recoveries, an area where Luton excel. If Luton maintain pressure and convert their chances, an away win feels like the most logical outcome.
19:45 Lincoln City v Bradford

Bradford

50 WIN

@+300

Lose

-50

Bradford may find success by exploiting Lincoln's occasional lack of creativity in midfield. Lincoln can be solid defensively but sometimes fail to control matches for long stretches. Bradford, with their more balanced approach, could take advantage of key moments and secure a valuable away victory.
19:45 Milton Keynes Dons v Bristol Rovers

Bristol Rovers

50 WIN

@+475

Lose

-50

Bristol Rovers enter this fixture with greater attacking fluidity and a more reliable midfield balance. MK Dons can create chances, but their defensive lapses often prove costly. If Rovers maintain their tempo and exploit space behind the back line, an away win looks highly achievable.
19:45 Notts County v Swindon

Swindon

50 WIN

@+250

Lose

-50

Swindon have the pace and tactical clarity to cause problems for a Notts County side that can be vulnerable under pressure. County may dominate possession, but Swindon often thrive in matches where they can counter quickly. An away win feels like the more reliable call.
19:45 Plymouth v Mansfield

Mansfield

50 WIN

@+290

Lose

-50

Mansfield have shown impressive resilience and efficiency in recent away performances, and that could be decisive here. Plymouth often struggle when opponents dictate the rhythm, something Mansfield do well. If Mansfield stay compact and strike on the break, an away win becomes a very credible prediction.
19:45 Rotherham v Northampton

Northampton

50 WIN

@+240

Lose

-50

Northampton have the energy and direct style to challenge Rotherham, who often struggle against teams willing to press high and disrupt their buildup. If Northampton stay organized and take advantage of set pieces, they could realistically claim all three points in a competitive away performance.
19:45 Salford City v Chesterfield

Chesterfield

50 WIN

@+309

Win

155

Chesterfield look stronger in terms of cohesion and attacking identity, which could be decisive here. Salford can compete physically but often lack consistency in the final third. If Chesterfield maintain their usual tempo and exploit defensive gaps, an away victory becomes a very realistic prediction.
19:45 Stevenage v Peterborough

Peterborough

50 WIN

@+240

Lose

-50

Peterborough's attacking quality and pace give them a clear path to success against a disciplined but limited Stevenage side. Stevenage may defend well for long periods, yet Peterborough usually find breakthroughs through movement and creativity. An away win looks the stronger prediction based on overall squad strength.
19:45 Walsall v Crawley Town

Crawley Town

50 WIN

@+375

Lose

-50

Crawley Town bring energy and direct attacking play that could trouble Walsall throughout the match. Walsall sometimes lose control in midfield, allowing opponents to build momentum. If Crawley remain aggressive and capitalize on loose defending, an away win seems the most likely scenario.
19:45 Wycombe v Wigan

Wigan

50 WIN

@+359

Lose

-50

Wigan appear well suited to this matchup, especially with their direct transitions and strong midfield control. Wycombe can be stubborn, but their defensive shape sometimes collapses under sustained pressure. Wigan's sharper finishing and tactical clarity suggest they can leave with all three points despite the difficult venue.
19:30 Newport County v Accrington Stanley

Newport County

50 WIN

@+220

Lose

-50

Newport County look well positioned to control this match through steady possession and a strong defensive structure. Accrington can be dangerous on the break, but their inconsistency away from home often limits their impact. If Newport maintain pressure and convert early chances, a home win appears the most realistic outcome.
09:40 Davide Stella vs Wan Abdul Rahman Hamdan

Wan Abdul Rahman Hamdan

Matchups

50 WIN

@+225

Lose

-50

Wan Abdul Rahman Hamdan looks slightly stronger for this matchup based on his recent climbing numbers and steady pacing in multi-stage events. Stella has shown flashes of form, but Hamdan delivers more consistent watt output over long efforts. Expect Hamdan to control the tempo and finish ahead if the stage features extended uphill sections.
09:40 Matteo Malucelli vs Pascal Ackermann

Matteo Malucelli

Matchups

50 WIN

@-136

Win

37

Matteo Malucelli may surprise here thanks to his strong sprint repeatability and improved positioning data. Ackermann is the bigger name, but his early-season form often starts slower. Malucelli has shown sharper acceleration over short bursts, and if the finish is chaotic, his timing could give him the winning margin.
09:00 John Higgins v Jamie Jones

Jamie Jones

Win Match

50 WIN

@+375

Lose

-50

Jamie Jones to win 5-3

Frame Betting

50 WIN

@+1400

Lose

-50

09:00 Nao Hibino vs Himeno Sakatsume

Nao Hibino

Win Match

50 WIN

@+250

Lose

-50

Nao Hibino holds the more reliable profile for this matchup thanks to her stronger tour-level experience, steadier rally tolerance, and better control on medium-paced hard courts. Sakatsume can pressure with early aggression, but her error rate tends to rise when exchanges extend. Hibino usually manages momentum shifts more effectively and converts break chances at a higher percentage. Over a full match, her consistency and tactical discipline make her the more dependable winner in this head-to-head scenario.

Nao Hibino to win 2 - 1

Set Betting

50 WIN

@+650

Lose

-50

Nao Hibino holds a slight edge thanks to her higher tour-level experience and stronger baseline stability under pressure. Sakatsume usually starts fast but can struggle to maintain depth on longer rallies. A three-set battle is realistic, with Hibino using her superior point construction to control key moments. Sakatsume should take a set through aggressive returning, but Hibino’s consistency and match management make a narrow 2-1 outcome the most data-supported scenario.

Over 20.50

Total Games

50 WIN

@-105

Win

47

The matchup leans toward a longer contest because both players rely on extended baseline exchanges rather than quick, high-risk finishes. Hibino’s consistency keeps most sets competitive, while Sakatsume’s aggressive patches often create momentum swings that stretch scorelines. Neither player typically dominates from start to finish, and both have shown tendencies to trade breaks rather than close sets quickly. These patterns support a realistic path to surpassing 20.5 games through one tight set and another moderately long frame.

Nao Hibino 4.50

Games Won

50 WIN

@+100

Lose

-50

The +4.5 handicap suits Nao Hibino because her rally tolerance and match management usually keep sets competitive even when she faces stronger baseline pressure. Sakatsume can generate momentum swings, but her inconsistency in longer exchanges often gives opponents enough scoring windows to stay within a tight margin. Hibino’s experience in controlling point tempo and limiting unforced errors makes her a strong candidate to cover +4.5, especially if both sets feature extended games and few quick collapses.
09:00 Si Jiahui v Fan Zhengyi

Fan Zhengyi

Win Match

50 WIN

@+175

Lose

-50

Fan Zhengyi to win 5-2

Frame Betting

50 WIN

@+1000

Lose

-50

09:00 Xiao Guodong v Robbie Williams

Robbie Williams

Win Match

50 WIN

@+275

Lose

-50

Robbie Williams to win 5-3

Frame Betting

50 WIN

@+1000

Lose

-50

Tips are normally be settled by 12pm the day after the event took place.
Tips history contains the last 35 days tips.

Please note that this information is for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon as an indicator of a tipsters real life performance. The OLBG Tipster Competition is a simulation game and some of the rules and prices used by the tipsters may not always be available in the real world which can lead to misleading informaiton.

By using this site you confirm you are 18+ and consent to our use of cookies and processing of personal data as set out in our Privacy Policy
Got it!