One girl jockey in a race

eddiew · Group 1 Class Joined: 04 Apr 2010 Posts: 289

She certainly does ted. I think it may be as high as 9-0 and she was the initial inspiration for this 'barmy system'. I think she must be wondering how on earth is the bloke champion jockey.

eddiew · Group 1 Class Joined: 04 Apr 2010 Posts: 289

Nice to see you backing a few winners from this thread ted (and eyeno, I hope). I have dropped the each ways Ted and just back straight wins but I am sure you will have tweaked your bets to suit your own preferences. A bit disappointed that Julie Burke is riding a selection today as I think alongside SM Levey she may be the worst jockey riding.

EyeNoAgain · Triple Crown Winner Joined: 03 Jun 2010 Posts: 1797

eddiew

What the hell is wrong with you, fellah? All I have done is highlight the fact that you are crowing about your ‘success’ but not keeping statistics to prove the veracity of your claims. I have tried to help you with tips from a long time spent on examining systems and backing horses. I have encouraged you in your lateral approach to winner finding. I have tried to guide you with words that a more experienced bettor on horses would find sensible – indeed there have been one or two more experienced guys that have backed up my statements. I have dared to include a few words of light banter that none but the most sensitive of people could take umbrage over. If you peer through that inferiority complex you will see that the word ‘numpty’ was accompanied by a LOL emoticom, a sign that it was a tease, not to be taken seriously. That is some chip you have on your shoulder!

Never have I claimed to have all the answers but I have been less dismissive of your ideas than the guys in the betting shop appear to be. You will never find me in a betting shop. I believe those guys are losers. They have the strange idea that they can bet in every race and come out on top! This, despite the wealth of statistics that underline the fact that whatever you choose, be it trainers, courses, types of race, jockeys, favourites, second favourites and everything else, you should lose. The figures confirm that the layers have a considerable advantage. Don’t believe me? Then take a look at the 5 year figures of such as Sir Henry Cecil, Sir Mark Prescott, Sir Michael Stoute, Paul Nicholls etc etc. The big message is that the layers should always win!

You have stated that you are not very experienced at backing horses. Well, that is obvious but I have tried to deliver some of the lessons that I have learned from over 50 years of backing horses. Some would say that was a kind gesture. Not you – you throw insults at me as thanks, you ingrate.

I am left to wonder what could be at the root of your problem. Could it be a deprived childhood or perhaps those horrible brutes in the betting shop laugh at you. However, I think the real thing that has led to your insulting words is that you know in your heart that my provision of reliable results will expose this ego trip that you are enjoying. Certainly the second week of statistics does tend to cast doubts over your claims (3 wins from 47 runners and Loss of 17.50 points). Only recording winners and forgetting losers can give a false impression as no doubt you are only too aware.

I do not need to prove myself to you. Your impression of me is really of no interest whatsoever but I do know that today has seen me complete a run of seven consecutive winning days in real money. Don’t believe me? I don’t care. I know that it is the truth.

How did your system go today? Oh! Another 11 losers from 11 selections. Better not mention that. Let’s not bring harsh reality into this fairyland. Let’s wait to crow about the next 20/1 third you find!

I shall now leave you and your silly system alone. I have wasted enough time doing the job you should have done in checking the real performance figures. Neither you nor your ‘system’ is worth the effort.

I do try to be pleasant on this site but you have accused me of being nasty. Now you know what nasty is. But you asked for it. Note – no emoticom.

bettingted · Posted: Fri Jul 13, 2012 12:44 am Post subject:

Friday 13th July 2012

One girl jockey in a race

Chepstow

620 No.3 Dawn Catcher Kirsty Milczarek
725 No.1 Barista Sophie Doyle

Chester

840 No.6 Must Be Me Cathy Gannon

Newbury

215 No.13 Downright Dizzie Leonna Mayor
325 No.3 Living Desert Kirsty Milczarek
400 No.4 Just For Mary Laura Simpson

Newmarket

No Selections

York

No Selections

..........................................................................

Girl jockeys on complete outsiders:

RESULTS Friday 13th July 2012 2012

1 PT EW TOTAL STAKED = PTS
1 PT EW TOTAL RETURNS = PTS
1 PT EW P/L =

................................................

1 PT WIN TOTAL STAKED = PTS
1 PT WIN TOTAL RETURNS = PTS
1 PT WIN P/L =

bettingted · Posted: Fri Jul 13, 2012 12:48 am Post subject:

eddiew not going to have ago, Ive already told you those comments weren't good about eyenoagain. Anyway it is between both of you and I am sure you will sort it out.

I've got some commitments I need to keep and I can only dedicate my spare time on the other 3 blogs so if you can try and spare 10 mins each day can you please post them. I will at least try and update all the results of all the days I have posted and maybe I can look at the overall pl in time.

If you can't do this can you please request someone else would volunteer, I think that this has real potential and I hope that you can keep it going. I will continue till Sunday and hopefully you or someone else can keep this going from Monday. Win

eddiew · Group 1 Class Joined: 04 Apr 2010 Posts: 289

Removed and points issued, any further outbursts like this and you will be banned from the site.

eddiew · Group 1 Class Joined: 04 Apr 2010 Posts: 289

Well eyeno for a man who relies on stats you have no stats to back up your claim of '7 consecutive winning days'. Well. there's a surprise, you are a fraud in my opinion. You, yourself found that this posting stood at a £131 profit for a £1 level stake. Therefore, a run of 11 losers is easily absorbed and I would in fact need a run of 132 losers to match your postings and show a LOSS (I have checked your selections, you seem to know everything about horse racing except how to back a winner). However, thank you for checking the stats of this posting but maybe you should now check your own and update your LOSS MAKING.

eddiew · Group 1 Class Joined: 04 Apr 2010 Posts: 289

PS Eyenow If you do happen to back winners at 25, 50, 74 and 100-1 you do tend to make a profit and can easily absorb losing runs. If you had a simple grasp of mathematics and basic arithmetic you would be able to understand this.

Online Trader · Posted: Fri Jul 13, 2012 10:22 am Post subject:

Guys can we draw a line under this now, there is no need to keep this bickering going, points have already been issued and we don't want members to be banned so lets just move on.

EyeNoAgain · Triple Crown Winner Joined: 03 Jun 2010 Posts: 1797

Online Trader

I regret bringing (or adding to) an air of hostility to the site but I cannot accept the kind of insults that were aimed at me.

I have already stated that I wish to have no more interest in a 'system' that I am certain to be doomed to failure due to lack of tracking. Pity really as I thought that there could just be some degree of potential in this novel approach.

I have already drawn a line as I trust you will appreciate.

eddiew · Group 1 Class Joined: 04 Apr 2010 Posts: 289

Ok Good luck with your future betting Eyeknow.

barney21 · Classic Winner Joined: 01 Feb 2007 Posts: 623

You both contribute well to this site,better that you pull together.good luck.